Lopez Emme, Gaspard Christine S
Dolph Briscoe, Jr. Library, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA.
Med Ref Serv Q. 2020 Jan-Mar;39(1):1-14. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2020.1693205.
Predatory publishing tactics are well-documented in the literature; however, the way in which academic librarians handle questions about these deceptive practices is not. A thorough review of the literature revealed a need for true decision-making tools that were easy to use and share. Based on this evidence, the authors developed Scholarly Tools Opposing Predatory Practices (STOPP) to empower librarians to make informed decisions by providing the appropriate context and tools for appraising journals, websites, conferences, and thesis converters. While geared toward academic medical librarians, these tools are built to evolve and adapt across disciplines as predatory practices evolve and adapt.
掠夺性出版策略在文献中有充分记载;然而,学术图书馆员处理有关这些欺骗性做法问题的方式却并非如此。对文献的全面回顾表明,需要真正易于使用和分享的决策工具。基于这一证据,作者开发了“反对掠夺性做法学术工具”(STOPP),通过提供评估期刊、网站、会议和论文转换器的适当背景和工具,使图书馆员能够做出明智的决策。虽然这些工具是针对学术医学图书馆员的,但随着掠夺性做法的演变和适应,它们旨在跨学科发展和调整。