Sirin Mumtaz Cem, Cicioglu Aridogan Buket, Sesli Cetin Emel, Sirin Fevziye Burcu
Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
Department of Medical Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, Turkey.
J Infect Dev Ctries. 2019 Aug 31;13(8):736-743. doi: 10.3855/jidc.11426.
The detection of HCV-RNA by PCR assays is considered to be the gold standard for confirming the presence of HCV viremia. However, high costs, long and laborious procedures limit their widespread usage. This retrospective study was conducted to assess the predictive performances of biochemical and hematological parameters, anti-HCV signal-to-cutoff (S/CO) ratios and RIBA assay for HCV viremia.
Medical records of 210 patients with positive anti-HCV results were analyzed. Samples were tested for anti-HCV by the Roche Elecsys assay. RIBA and PCR assays were performed with Inno-Lia HCV Score test, and Roche Cobas TaqMan HCV test, respectively.
Anti-HCV positive patients were categorized into two groups: positive HCV-RNA(viremic) group (n = 94) and negative HCV-RNA(non-viremic) group (n = 116). All viremic patients had positive RIBA results, while in the non-viremic group, 80 (69%) patients had negative/indeterminate RIBA results and 36 (31%) patients had positive RIBA results. Compared with the non-viremic group, the viremic group had significantly higher alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, mean platelet volume, platelet distribution width and anti-HCV levels, and significantly lower platelet count and plateletcrit levels (p < 0.05). With multivariate logistic regression analysis, serum ALT and anti-HCV levels were found to be strong predictive factors for HCV viremia. A S/CO ratio of ≥ 12.34 was identified as the optimal anti-HCV level to predict viremia.
An anti-HCV S/CO ratio of 12.34 can determine the necessity for PCR assay, when carefully evaluated together with the biochemical and hematological evidence. This approach may reduce the cost of diagnosis particularly in low-resource settings.
通过聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测丙型肝炎病毒核糖核酸(HCV-RNA)被认为是确认HCV病毒血症存在的金标准。然而,高成本、漫长且繁琐的操作程序限制了它们的广泛应用。本回顾性研究旨在评估生化和血液学参数、抗HCV信号与临界值(S/CO)比值以及重组免疫印迹法(RIBA)检测对HCV病毒血症的预测性能。
分析了210例抗HCV结果呈阳性患者的病历。采用罗氏电化学发光免疫分析法检测抗HCV样本。分别使用免疫印迹法和PCR法进行Inno-Lia HCV Score检测及罗氏Cobas TaqMan HCV检测。
抗HCV阳性患者被分为两组:HCV-RNA阳性(病毒血症)组(n = 94)和HCV-RNA阴性(非病毒血症)组(n = 116)。所有病毒血症患者的RIBA结果均为阳性,而在非病毒血症组中,80例(69%)患者的RIBA结果为阴性/不确定,36例(31%)患者的RIBA结果为阳性。与非病毒血症组相比,病毒血症组的丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸氨基转移酶、γ-谷氨酰转移酶、平均血小板体积、血小板分布宽度和抗HCV水平显著更高,而血小板计数和血小板压积水平显著更低(p < 0.05)。通过多因素逻辑回归分析,发现血清ALT和抗HCV水平是HCV病毒血症的强预测因素。确定S/CO比值≥12.34为预测病毒血症的最佳抗HCV水平。
当与生化和血液学证据一起仔细评估时,抗HCV S/CO比值为12.34可确定是否需要进行PCR检测。这种方法可能会降低诊断成本,尤其是在资源匮乏的地区。