Suppr超能文献

碳点和 DNA 在纳米氧化铈上的正交吸附。

Orthogonal Adsorption of Carbon Dots and DNA on Nanoceria.

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Bioelectronics, National Demonstration Center for Experimental Biomedical Engineering Education, School of Biological Science and Medical Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.

Department of Chemistry, Waterloo Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 3G1, Canada.

出版信息

Langmuir. 2020 Mar 10;36(9):2474-2481. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.9b03960. Epub 2020 Feb 25.

Abstract

Carbon dots (CDs) are highly fluorescent nanomaterials with surface carboxyl and amino groups. However, their exact structure remains under debate. In this work, we probed the surface properties of CDs by physically adsorbing them onto various nanomaterials. Three types of nanomaterials, including CeO nanoparticles (nanoceria), gold nanoparticles, and graphene oxide were tested. Among them, nanoceria strongly adsorbed the CDs and quenched their fluorescence. For the tested anions to compete with the CDs for adsorption, only phosphate and F induced desorption of the CDs from nanoceria, and the phosphate-induced desorption was less compared to that by F. This was opposite to the desorption of DNA from nanoceria, where phosphate induced more DNA desorption. Furthermore, using calcein and fluorescein as representative dyes for comparison, we conclude that the CDs might use their carboxyl groups to adsorb on nanoceria, while DNA uses its phosphate backbone for adsorption. This difference may explain their occupying different surface sites on nanoceria and different displacement by phosphate and F. Using nanomaterials as probes to understand the surface properties of CDs is effective, and such understanding might in turn be used for building hybrid materials for applications.

摘要

碳点(CDs)是具有表面羧基和氨基的高度荧光纳米材料。然而,它们的确切结构仍存在争议。在这项工作中,我们通过物理吸附将 CDs 吸附到各种纳米材料上来探测它们的表面特性。测试了三种纳米材料,包括 CeO2 纳米颗粒(纳米氧化铈)、金纳米颗粒和氧化石墨烯。其中,纳米氧化铈强烈吸附 CDs 并猝灭其荧光。对于测试的阴离子与 CDs 竞争吸附,只有磷酸盐和 F 能从纳米氧化铈上解吸 CDs,而磷酸盐诱导的解吸比 F 诱导的解吸少。这与 DNA 从纳米氧化铈上的解吸相反,其中磷酸盐诱导更多的 DNA 解吸。此外,使用钙黄绿素和荧光素作为代表性染料进行比较,我们得出结论,CDs 可能使用其羧基吸附在纳米氧化铈上,而 DNA 则使用其磷酸骨架进行吸附。这种差异可能解释了它们在纳米氧化铈上占据不同的表面位和被磷酸盐和 F 不同取代的原因。使用纳米材料作为探针来了解 CDs 的表面特性是有效的,这种理解反过来又可以用于构建用于应用的混合材料。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验