• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创钢板接骨术治疗胫骨远端骨折中延迟螺钉对愈合时间的影响:一项随机临床试验。

The impact of lag screw in the healing time of distal tibia fractures treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: A randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Orthopedic & Trauma Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro" - AOU Consorziale "Policlinico", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70100 Bari, Italy.

Orthopedic & Trauma Unit, Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, School of Medicine, University of Bari "Aldo Moro" - AOU Consorziale "Policlinico", Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70100 Bari, Italy.

出版信息

Injury. 2020 Aug;51 Suppl 3:S80-S85. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.042. Epub 2020 Feb 12.

DOI:10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.042
PMID:32070556
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) has been gaining popularity in the treatment of distal tibia fractures, because it is a minimally invasive surgical procedure, thus it limits the soft-tissues damage. This prospective randomized study aims to assess the impact of lag screw in the healing time of distal tibia fractures treated with MIPO technique, in a six-month follow-up.

METHODS

Patients between 20 and 70 years of age with distal tibial fracture, type 43-A according to AO/OTA classification system were included. All the patients were randomized into two groups, to receive MIPO without lag screw (Group-A) or MIPO with percutaneous lag screw (Group-B). Patients were followed clinically and radiographically at 3, 6, 12 and 24 weeks postoperatively. The main outcome measure was the time needed to achieve the painless full weight-bearing (FWB) after surgery. Unpaired t-test after ANOVA (analysis of variance) was performed to assess AOFAS score differences between the 2 groups at each follow-up. Pearson correlation test also was performed. The tests were two-tailed with a confidence level of 5%.

RESULTS

42 patients (24 male and 18 female, mean age 49.54 years old, range 25-80) were recruited. A significant shorter mean time until painless FWB (p = 0.016) was observed in Group-B (11.22 ± 3.06 weeks) compared with Group-A (13.48 ± 2.42 weeks) (Table 2). The mean AOFAS score was comparable in patients treated with (Group-B) and without lag screw (Group-A) at all follow-ups.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective randomized clinical study has shown that the use of lag screw in distal tibia fractures treated with MIPO technique speeds the fracture healing, thus shortening the time needed to achieve FWB.

摘要

背景

近年来,微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)在治疗胫骨远端骨折方面越来越受欢迎,因为它是一种微创手术,因此限制了软组织的损伤。本前瞻性随机研究旨在评估在 6 个月的随访中,拉力螺钉对 MIPO 技术治疗胫骨远端骨折愈合时间的影响。

方法

纳入年龄在 20 至 70 岁之间、AO/OTA 分类系统为 43-A 型的胫骨远端骨折患者。所有患者均随机分为两组,一组接受无拉力螺钉的 MIPO(A 组),另一组接受经皮拉力螺钉的 MIPO(B 组)。患者在术后 3、6、12 和 24 周进行临床和影像学随访。主要观察指标为术后达到无痛完全负重(FWB)所需的时间。采用方差分析(ANOVA)后进行单样本 t 检验,以评估两组在每个随访时间点 AOFAS 评分的差异。还进行了 Pearson 相关性检验。检验为双侧检验,置信水平为 5%。

结果

共纳入 42 例患者(24 例男性,18 例女性;平均年龄 49.54 岁,范围 25-80 岁)。B 组(11.22±3.06 周)达到无痛 FWB 的平均时间明显短于 A 组(13.48±2.42 周)(p=0.016)(表 2)。在所有随访中,接受和未接受拉力螺钉治疗的患者的 AOFAS 评分均相似。

结论

本前瞻性随机临床研究表明,在 MIPO 技术治疗胫骨远端骨折中使用拉力螺钉可加速骨折愈合,从而缩短达到 FWB 所需的时间。

相似文献

1
The impact of lag screw in the healing time of distal tibia fractures treated with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: A randomized clinical trial.微创钢板接骨术治疗胫骨远端骨折中延迟螺钉对愈合时间的影响:一项随机临床试验。
Injury. 2020 Aug;51 Suppl 3:S80-S85. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.02.042. Epub 2020 Feb 12.
2
Absolute or relative stability in minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis of simple distal meta or diaphyseal tibia fractures?单纯胫骨远端干骺端或骨干骨折微创钢板接骨术中的绝对或相对稳定性?
Injury. 2017 Jun;48(6):1217-1223. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
3
[Treatment of Fractures of the Distal Third of Tibia Diaphysis by MIPO Technique].[应用微创经皮钢板内固定技术治疗胫骨干下1/3骨折]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2020;87(2):114-119.
4
Role of Appositional Screw Fixation in Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Distal Tibial Fracture.附加螺钉固定在胫骨远端骨折微创钢板接骨术中的作用
J Orthop Trauma. 2015 Sep;29(9):e331-5. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000341.
5
Minimally-invasive plate osteosynthesis in distal tibial fractures: Results and complications.胫骨远端骨折的微创钢板接骨术:结果与并发症
Injury. 2015 Nov;46 Suppl 6:S96-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.10.067. Epub 2015 Nov 14.
6
The use of interfragmentary positional screw in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for simple distal femur fractures in elderly patients: A retrospective, single-centre pilot study.老年患者单纯性股骨远端骨折微创钢板接骨术中使用骨折块间定位螺钉:一项回顾性单中心初步研究。
Injury. 2016 Dec;47(12):2795-2799. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.10.034. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
7
Combination of interfragmentary screws and locking plates in distal meta-diaphyseal fractures of the tibia: a retrospective, single-centre pilot study.交锁髓内钉联合锁定钢板治疗胫骨远段干骺端骨折:一项回顾性单中心初步研究。
Injury. 2011 Oct;42(10):1031-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2011.05.010. Epub 2011 Jun 12.
8
A Prospective Randomized Study on Operative Treatment for Simple Distal Tibial Fractures-Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis Versus Minimal Open Reduction and Internal Fixation.一项关于单纯胫骨干骺端骨折手术治疗的前瞻性随机研究——微创钢板接骨术与有限切开复位内固定术的比较
J Orthop Trauma. 2018 Jan;32(1):e19-e24. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001007.
9
Fracture gap and working length are important actionable factors affecting bone union after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of simple diaphyseal or distal metaphyseal tibia fractures.骨折间隙和工作长度是微创钢板接骨术治疗单纯骨干或胫骨远端干骺端骨折后影响骨愈合的重要可操作因素。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2024 Apr;110(2):103770. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2023.103770. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
10
Comparison of intramedullary nailing and minimal invasive plate osteosynthesis in the treatment of simple intra-articular fractures of the distal tibia (AO-OTA type 43 C1-C2).髓内钉固定与微创钢板接骨术治疗单纯胫骨远端关节内骨折(AO-OTA 43 C1-C2型)的比较
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Jan;51(1):12-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.07.010. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Treatment strategies for complex ankle fractures-current developments summarized in a narrative review.复杂踝关节骨折的治疗策略——叙述性综述中总结的当前进展
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Oct 25;11(11):387. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1173. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
2
Second and Third Pandemic Waves in Apulia: How COVID-19 Affected Orthopedic and Trauma Care-A Single-Center Study.普利亚大区的第二波和第三波疫情:新冠疫情对骨科和创伤护理的影响——一项单中心研究
J Clin Med. 2022 Nov 3;11(21):6526. doi: 10.3390/jcm11216526.
3
A Novel Approach Combined with MIPO Technique for the Treatment of Type C Pilon Fractures.
一种结合 MIPO 技术治疗 C 型 Pilon 骨折的新方法。
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022 Jun 14;2022:7427255. doi: 10.1155/2022/7427255. eCollection 2022.
4
Management of Pilon Fractures-Current Concepts.Pilon骨折的治疗——当前概念
Front Surg. 2021 Dec 23;8:764232. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.764232. eCollection 2021.
5
Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for short oblique diaphyseal tibia fractures: does fracture site affect the outcomes?微创钢板接骨术治疗胫骨干短斜形骨折:骨折部位会影响治疗结果吗?
J Int Med Res. 2020 Oct;48(10):300060520965402. doi: 10.1177/0300060520965402.