Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Feb;42:58-63.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2019.12.009. Epub 2019 Dec 31.
We sought to assess the association of reports of discrimination with leukocyte telomere length (LTL) and effect measure modification by social support.
This study used data from the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis Stress Ancillary Study (n = 1153). Discrimination was measured using the everyday discrimination and the major experiences of discrimination scales. LTL was defined as the ratio of telomeric DNA to single-copy control gene (mean = 0.916, SD = 0.205). Linear regression models were used to examine the relationship between discrimination and LTL.
We found no association between either measure of discrimination and LTL, but there was evidence of effect modification by social support (P (χ) = 0.001) for everyday discrimination only. Among those with low social support, reporting moderate and high everyday discrimination was associated with a 0.35 (95% CI: -0.54 to -0.16) and a 0.17 (95% CI: -0.34 to -0.01) shorter telomere length, respectively, compared to reporting no discrimination, after adjusting for demographic factors, health behaviors, and health conditions. There were no associations between discrimination and LTL among those reporting moderate or high social support.
These findings underscore the importance of continued investigation of the potential health consequences of chronic unfair treatment in the absence of supportive resources.
我们旨在评估报告的歧视与白细胞端粒长度(LTL)之间的关联,并通过社会支持来衡量效应修正。
本研究使用了动脉粥样硬化多民族研究压力辅助研究(n=1153)的数据。歧视是通过日常歧视和重大歧视经历量表来衡量的。LTL 的定义是端粒 DNA 与单拷贝对照基因的比值(平均值=0.916,标准差=0.205)。线性回归模型用于研究歧视与 LTL 之间的关系。
我们没有发现任何一种歧视衡量指标与 LTL 之间存在关联,但只有日常歧视存在社会支持的效应修饰(P(χ)=0.001)。在社会支持较低的人群中,报告中度和高度日常歧视与无歧视相比,端粒长度分别缩短了 0.35(95%CI:-0.54 至-0.16)和 0.17(95%CI:-0.34 至-0.01),在调整了人口统计学因素、健康行为和健康状况后。在报告中度或高度社会支持的人群中,歧视与 LTL 之间没有关联。
这些发现强调了在缺乏支持资源的情况下,持续研究慢性不公平待遇对健康的潜在影响的重要性。