Comparison of Neonatal Outcomes With the Use Cefotaxime Versus Ceftazidime in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVES

There is a national drug shortage of cefotaxime, and ceftazidime is recommended as an alternative to cefotaxime for neonates. This study evaluated culture-positive late-onset sepsis (LOS), multidrug resistant organisms (MDROs), and other neonatal outcomes with the use of ceftazidime compared with cefotaxime in neonates.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of neonatal subjects who received at least 24 hours of ceftazidime or cefotaxime between April 1, 2015, and August 1, 2017. Subjects were excluded if they received the alternate antibiotic for more than 24 hours.

RESULTS

A total of 101 subjects were included (ceftazidime, n = 58; cefotaxime, n = 43). Median gestational ages were significantly different between groups (28.1 [IQR, 25.0-36.6] weeks versus 32.3 [IQR, 26.9-37.4] in the ceftazidime and cefotaxime groups, respectively, p < 0.05). Results showed a non-statistically significant increased incidence of culture-positive LOS (17.2% versus 2.3%, respectively, adjusted OR 6.51 [95% CI, 0.78-55.23], p = 0.09) and MDRO infections (5.2% versus 0%, respectively, p = 0.26) with the use of ceftazidime compared with cefotaxime. There was a statistically significant increased risk of stage II to III necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) with the use of ceftazidime (22.4% versus 2.3%, respectively, adjusted OR 9.68 [95% CI, 1.18-79.45], p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

This study found a statistically significant increase in stage II to III NEC with the use of ceftazidime compared with cefotaxime. There was a higher rate of culture-positive LOS and MDRO infections with ceftazidime, but this was not significant. Further research is warranted to assess the implications ceftazidime use in neonates.