Tondas Alexander Edo, Mulawarman Rido, Trifitriana Monica, Abisha Savero Evan, Pranata Raymond
Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine Mohammad Hoesin General Hospital Palembang Sumatera Selatan Indonesia.
Biomedicine Doctoral Program Faculty of Medicine Universitas Sriwijaya Palembang Indonesia.
J Arrhythm. 2019 Dec 16;36(1):199-202. doi: 10.1002/joa3.12287. eCollection 2020 Feb.
In up to 13.7% of device implants, lead entry through the cephalic, axillary, or subclavian veins might be unfeasible. Transjugular permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation may be considered as a bailout strategy in the difficult anatomy of conventional veins, before resorting to epicardial pacing lead, which requires general anesthesia and thoracotomy. We described a case report of a single chamber PPM implantation in an 83-year-old man using transjugular Seldinger approach without surgical cut down of the internal jugular vein, due to spasm, stenosis, and thrombosis of the upper limbs venous systems. Acceptable lead impedance and threshold were maintained during 2 months follow-up.
在高达13.7%的设备植入病例中,经头静脉、腋静脉或锁骨下静脉置入导线可能不可行。在采用需要全身麻醉和开胸手术的心外膜起搏导线之前,经颈静脉永久起搏器(PPM)植入可被视为常规静脉解剖结构复杂时的一种补救策略。我们报告了一例83岁男性患者,因上肢静脉系统痉挛、狭窄和血栓形成,采用经颈静脉Seldinger技术进行单腔PPM植入,未进行颈内静脉的外科切开。在2个月的随访期间,导线阻抗和阈值保持在可接受范围内。