Burnes David, DeLiema Marguerite, Langton Lynn
University of Toronto, Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, 246 Bloor Street West, Toronto, Ontario, M5S1V4, Canada.
University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, School of Social Work, 105 Peters Hall, 1404 Gortner Ave., St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
Prev Med Rep. 2020 Jan 23;17:101058. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101058. eCollection 2020 Mar.
Identity theft victimization is associated with serious physical and mental health morbidities. The problem is expanding as society becomes increasingly reliant on technology to store and transfer personally identifying information. Guided by lifestyle-routine activity theory, this study sought to identify risk and protective factors associated with identity theft victimization and determine whether individual-level behaviors, including frequency of online purchasing and data protection practices, are determinative of victimization. Data from sequential administrations of the U.S. National Crime Victimization Survey-Identity Theft Supplement (ITS) in 2012 and 2014 were combined (N = 128,419). Using multivariable logistic regression, risk and protective factors were examined for three subtypes: 1) unauthorized use of existing credit card/bank accounts, and unauthorized use of personal information to 2) open new accounts, or 3) engage in instrumental activities (e.g., applying for government benefits, receiving medical care, filing false tax returns). Existing credit card/bank accounts and new accounts identity theft victimization were associated with higher levels of online purchasing activity and prior identity theft victimization. All identity theft subtypes were associated with government/corporate data breaches and other crime victimization experiences. Routine individual-level preventive behaviors such as changing online passwords and shredding/destroying documents were protective. Identity theft subtypes showed divergent socio-demographic risk/protective profiles, with those of higher socioeconomic status more likely to be victims of existing credit card/bank account identity theft. Identity theft is a pervasive, growing problem with serious health and psychosocial consequences, yet individuals can engage in specific protective behaviors to mitigate victimization risk.
身份盗窃受害与严重的身心健康问题相关。随着社会越来越依赖技术来存储和传输个人身份信息,这个问题正在不断扩大。本研究以生活方式 - 日常活动理论为指导,旨在确定与身份盗窃受害相关的风险和保护因素,并确定包括在线购物频率和数据保护措施在内的个人层面行为是否决定受害情况。将2012年和2014年美国国家犯罪受害情况调查 - 身份盗窃补充调查(ITS)连续管理的数据进行合并(N = 128,419)。使用多变量逻辑回归,对三种亚型的风险和保护因素进行了研究:1)未经授权使用现有信用卡/银行账户,以及未经授权使用个人信息以2)开设新账户,或3)从事工具性活动(例如,申请政府福利、接受医疗护理、提交虚假纳税申报单)。现有信用卡/银行账户和新账户身份盗窃受害与更高水平的在线购物活动和先前的身份盗窃受害情况相关。所有身份盗窃亚型都与政府/企业数据泄露和其他犯罪受害经历相关。日常的个人层面预防行为,如更改在线密码和粉碎/销毁文件,具有保护作用。身份盗窃亚型显示出不同的社会人口统计学风险/保护特征,社会经济地位较高的人更有可能成为现有信用卡/银行账户身份盗窃的受害者。身份盗窃是一个普遍存在且不断增长的问题,会带来严重的健康和社会心理后果,但个人可以采取特定的保护行为来降低受害风险。