Nöth U, Rackwitz L, Clarius M
Klinik für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie, Evangelisches Waldkrankenhaus Spandau, Stadtrandstraße 555, 13589, Berlin, Deutschland.
Vulpius Klinik GmbH, Bad Rappenau, Deutschland.
Orthopade. 2020 Apr;49(4):334-337. doi: 10.1007/s00132-020-03887-8.
While fast-track arthroplasty has been already established in many European countries and the United States, Germany still struggles to introduce appropriate programs. This is due to a variety of reasons.
From an organizational and medical scope, the fear of alteration, the adherence to restrictions rooted in historical tradition, the reluctance to interdisciplinary cooperation, and the lack of a willingness to implement externally-guided process analysis tools, stand in the foreground. This is system related, and especially the DRG-system with the continuous devaluation of lump compensation rates in primary hip and knee arthroplasty, also in 2020, hinders the implementation. The resulting fears and concerns that an additional reduction of the length-of-stay by fast-track programs is leading to a consistent reduction of the DRG returns, are understandable. On the other hand, the disconnectedness of the ambulatory, inpatient and rehabilitation sector in Germany inhibits the introduction of fast-track programs.
A well-thought-out change-management is the basic requirement for the successfull establishment of a Fast-Track-Program. Perspectively, a rethinking towards sector-comprehensive care strategies for the implantation of a total hip or knee replacement, including the required rehabilitation procedures, has to be demanded.
虽然快速康复关节置换术在许多欧洲国家和美国已经确立,但德国仍在努力推行合适的项目。这是由多种原因造成的。
从组织和医学层面来看,对变革的恐惧、对源于历史传统的限制的坚持、不愿进行跨学科合作以及缺乏实施外部指导的流程分析工具的意愿,是主要原因。这与系统有关,特别是疾病诊断相关分组(DRG)系统,2020年原发性髋关节和膝关节置换术中包干补偿率持续贬值,这阻碍了该项目的实施。由此产生的担忧,即快速康复项目导致住院时间进一步缩短会使DRG回报持续减少,是可以理解的。另一方面,德国门诊、住院和康复部门之间的脱节也阻碍了快速康复项目的推行。
精心策划的变革管理是成功建立快速康复项目的基本要求。从长远来看,必须重新思考针对全髋关节或全膝关节置换植入术(包括所需的康复程序)的部门综合护理策略。