Suppr超能文献

右半结肠反转对检测标准正视图未显示的额外结肠病变的成功率、安全性和有效性。

Success, safety, and usefulness of right colon retroflexion for the detection of additional colonic lesions not visualized with standard frontal view.

机构信息

Gastroenterology Department, Endoscopy Unit, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2021 Feb;35(2):620-625. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07424-8. Epub 2020 Feb 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Missed adenomas are the main concern for endoscopists. Right colon retroflexion (RCR) seems to increase the adenoma detection rate (ADR), but important variation in success and usefulness of this maneuver has been reported in the literature AIMS: Primary objective: to assess additional adenoma detection rate (AADR) detected during the RCR attempt. Secondary objectives: to assess success rates of RCR, variables associated with it, and safety of RCR.

METHODS

This is a prospective, unicentric, non-randomized study. Consecutive colonoscopies done by six endoscopists (3 of them with < 3 years of experience and 3 with > 3 years) from March to May 2017 were included. Olympus colonoscopes were used (CF-H190, CF-H180) Demographic, clinical, and endoscopic variables were collected.

RESULTS

463 colonoscopies were included. RCR success rate was 93.1% (431/463 colonoscopies). Forty additional lesions were visualized during RCR in 34/463 colonoscopies (7.3%). Additional adenomas were detected in 31/463 colonoscopies (6.7%; OR 0.07).

HISTOLOGY

low-grade dysplasia adenomas in 29/40 (72.5%) lesions; 3/40 (7.5%), adenomas with high-grade dysplasia; and 7/40 (17.5%) sessile serrated lesions. Additional adenoma detection contributed to modify the colonoscopy surveillance interval in 25 patients (5.4% of the cohort). Variables associated with RCR success in multivariate analysis were no previous abdominal surgery, length of colonoscope insertion in cecum < 80 cm, and use of Olympus 190 series colonoscopes. No differences between endoscopists' experience were found. RCR was a safe maneuver, with no adverse events in our study.

CONCLUSIONS

RCR is a feasible and safe maneuver that can increase ADR, so its routine inclusion in colonoscopy practice should be considered.

摘要

背景

漏诊的腺瘤是内镜医生最关心的问题。右半结肠反转(RCR)似乎可以提高腺瘤检出率(ADR),但文献中报道了这种操作的成功率和有效性存在重要差异。

目的

主要目的:评估 RCR 尝试过程中额外检出的腺瘤检出率(AADR)。次要目的:评估 RCR 的成功率、与 RCR 相关的变量以及 RCR 的安全性。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、单中心、非随机研究。纳入了 2017 年 3 月至 5 月由 6 名内镜医生(其中 3 名经验不足 3 年,3 名经验超过 3 年)连续进行的结肠镜检查。使用奥林巴斯结肠镜(CF-H190、CF-H180)。收集了人口统计学、临床和内镜变量。

结果

共纳入 463 例结肠镜检查。RCR 成功率为 93.1%(431/463 例结肠镜检查)。在 463 例结肠镜检查中,有 34 例(7.3%)在 RCR 过程中观察到 40 个额外病变。在 463 例结肠镜检查中,有 31 例(6.7%;OR 0.07)发现了额外的腺瘤。

组织学

29/40(72.5%)病变为低级别异型增生腺瘤;3/40(7.5%)为高级别异型增生腺瘤;7/40(17.5%)为无蒂锯齿状病变。额外腺瘤的检出有助于改变 25 例患者(队列的 5.4%)的结肠镜检查监测间隔。多变量分析中与 RCR 成功相关的变量包括无既往腹部手术、结肠镜插入盲肠的长度<80cm 以及使用奥林巴斯 190 系列结肠镜。未发现内镜医生经验之间存在差异。RCR 是一种安全的操作,本研究中无不良事件发生。

结论

RCR 是一种可行且安全的操作,可以提高 ADR,因此应考虑将其常规纳入结肠镜检查实践中。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验