Brown A, Tsianou Z, Williams H C
Department of Dermatology, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Plymouth, UK.
Department of Dermatology, Basildon and Thurrock University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Basildon, UK.
Br J Dermatol. 2020 Dec;183(6):1033-1036. doi: 10.1111/bjd.18956. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
Johnson et al. aimed to assess caregivers' willingness to treat childhood atopic dermatitis (AD) with a corticosteroid when presented with clinical trial evidence, anecdote, or both.
This prospective parallel group (1: 1; eight groups) randomized control trial (RCT) was carried out with caregivers recruited from a tertiary care dermatology clinic in the USA and an online crowdsourcing platform using caregivers who may not have had a child with AD.
Caregivers were randomized to eight groups. The three main groups were given clinical trial evidence, anecdote, or a combination of both. Each of these three groups was further divided and presented with either the term 'medication' or 'topical steroid'. These were compared with the two remaining groups, which included a group told that they would not be informed of a medication's efficacy or safety profile, and a group informed that the medication was recommended by the doctor.
Caregivers were asked about their willingness to treat based on the information they had received using a 10-point Likert scale where 1 was 'not willing' and 10 'completely willing'.
A total of 476 caregivers were recruited (80 clinic, 396 online), 48% of whom had a history of a child with AD. Caregivers' willingness to treat was higher in all information assignment groups compared with those not provided with safety information: clinical trial evidence of a 'medication' (P = 0·003; Cohen's d = 0·83) or 'topical steroid' (P = 0·030; d = 0·55), anecdote of a 'medication' (P < 0·0001; d = 1·37) or 'topical steroid' (P < 0·0001; d = 0·85), both clinical trial evidence and anecdote of a 'medication' (P < 0·0001; d = 1·00) or 'topical steroid' (P = 0·000; d = 0·89), and simply the doctor's recommendation (P < 0·0001; d = 0·92).
Johnson et al. conclude that the provision of anecdotal reassurance may be an effective strategy to improve caregivers' willingness to use topical steroids.
Exploring factors that affect caregivers' willingness to adhere to topical corticosteroids is an important area of research. This study was a potentially efficient way of conducting a rapid RCT to explore such factors. The study conclusions are significantly undermined by lack of a registered trial protocol, poor trial reporting, the use of caregivers who did not have experience of AD, the multiplicity and complexity of treatment arms, and the use of an unvalidated primary outcome.
约翰逊等人旨在评估当向照料者呈现临床试验证据、轶事或两者皆有时,他们使用皮质类固醇治疗儿童特应性皮炎(AD)的意愿。
这项前瞻性平行组(1:1;八组)随机对照试验(RCT)是在美国一家三级护理皮肤科诊所和一个在线众包平台招募照料者进行的,这些照料者可能没有患AD的孩子。
照料者被随机分为八组。三个主要组分别被给予临床试验证据、轶事或两者的组合。这三组中的每一组又进一步细分,并分别呈现“药物”或“外用类固醇”这两个术语。将这些组与另外两组进行比较,一组被告知不会被告知药物的疗效或安全性概况,另一组被告知该药物是医生推荐的。
基于所收到的信息,使用10分制李克特量表询问照料者的治疗意愿,1分为“不愿意”,10分为“完全愿意”。
总共招募了476名照料者(80名来自诊所,396名来自在线平台),其中48%的人有孩子患AD的病史。与未获得安全信息的组相比,所有信息分配组中的照料者治疗意愿更高:“药物”(P = 0.003;科恩d值 = 0.83)或“外用类固醇”(P = 0.030;d = 0.55)的临床试验证据,“药物”(P < 0.0001;d = 1.37)或“外用类固醇”(P < 0.0001;d = 0.85)的轶事,“药物”(P < 0.0001;d = 1.00)或“外用类固醇”(P = 0.000;d = 0.89)的临床试验证据和轶事,以及仅仅是医生的推荐(P < 0.0001;d = 0.92)。
约翰逊等人得出结论,提供轶事性的安心信息可能是提高照料者使用外用类固醇意愿的有效策略。
探索影响照料者坚持使用外用皮质类固醇意愿的因素是一个重要的研究领域。这项研究是进行快速随机对照试验以探索此类因素的一种潜在有效方法。由于缺乏注册试验方案、试验报告不佳、使用没有AD经验的照料者、治疗组的多样性和复杂性以及使用未经验证的主要结局,该研究的结论受到了严重削弱。