Suppr超能文献

长 DrySeal 鞘在经导管肺动脉瓣植入术(Edwards Sapien 3 瓣膜)中应用的实用性。

Utility of the long DrySeal sheath in facilitating transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Ahmanson Adult Congenital Heart Disease Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, California.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Nov;96(6):E646-E652. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28776. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of the 65-cm-long Gore DrySeal sheath when compared to the standard 36-cm-long Edwards expandable sheath (e-sheath) for transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation (TPVI) with the Edwards Sapien 3 valve.

METHODS

All patients who underwent TPVI with the Sapien 3 valve, excluding those performed via hybrid approach, at our center between September 2015 and November 2019 were retrospectively reviewed and compared between two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 94 patients were enrolled; 29 patients underwent TPVI with the Sapien valve using the DrySeal sheath and 65 underwent TPVI using the e-sheath. The height and body weight of patients implanted using the DrySeal sheath ranged from 137 to 193 cm and from 33 to 129 kg, respectively. Valve delivery time was significantly shorter in the DrySeal group (median time 4 min 33 s vs. 9 min 6 s, p = .002). There were no complications in the DrySeal group (0/27). Nine procedural complications occurred in the e-sheath group (9/65), five of which were potentially directly related to sheath choice, including tricuspid valve injury in four and embolization of the tip of the e-sheath during retrieval of a ruptured balloon in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

TPVI with the Sapien 3 valve using the 65-cm-long DrySeal sheath facilitates faster and safer valve implantation when compared to the e-sheath.

摘要

目的

评估 65cm 长戈尔干密封鞘与标准 36cm 长爱德华可扩张鞘(e-鞘)在经导管肺动脉瓣植入术(TPVI)中用于爱德华·萨皮恩 3 号瓣的应用效果。

方法

回顾性分析 2015 年 9 月至 2019 年 11 月在我中心接受经导管肺动脉瓣植入术的患者,排除经杂交途径进行的患者,并将其分为两组。

结果

共纳入 94 例患者;29 例患者使用干密封鞘进行 TPVI,65 例患者使用 e-鞘进行 TPVI。使用干密封鞘植入的患者身高和体重范围分别为 137-193cm 和 33-129kg。干密封组的瓣膜输送时间明显更短(中位数时间 4 分 33 秒比 9 分 6 秒,p =.002)。干密封组无并发症(0/27)。e-鞘组发生 9 例手术并发症(9/65),其中 5 例可能与鞘选择直接相关,包括 4 例三尖瓣损伤和 1 例回收破裂球囊时 e-鞘尖端栓塞。

结论

与 e-鞘相比,使用 65cm 长的干密封鞘进行经导管肺动脉瓣植入术,可更快、更安全地植入瓣膜。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验