State Key Laboratory of Lake Science and Environment, Nanjing Institute of Geography and Limnology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 73 East Beijing Road, Nanjing 210008, P. R. China.
School of Geography & Ocean Science, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Street, Nanjing 210023, P. R. China.
Environ Sci Technol. 2020 Mar 17;54(6):3191-3198. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.9b05858. Epub 2020 Feb 28.
Eutrophication mitigation is an ongoing priority for aquatic ecosystems. However, the current eutrophication control strategies (phosphorus (P) and/or nitrogen (N)) are guided mainly by nutrient addition experiments in small waters without encompassing all in-lake biogeochemical processes that are associated largely with lake morphological characteristics. Here, we use a global lake data set (573 lakes) to show that the relative roles of N vs P in affecting eutrophication are underpinned by water depth. Mean depth and maximum depth relative to mixing depth were used to distinguish shallow (mixing depth > maximum depth), deep (mixing depth < mean depth), and transitional (mean depth ≤ mixing depth ≤ maximum depth) lakes in this study. TN/TP ratio (by mass) was used as an indicator of potential lake nutrient limitation, i.e., N only limitation if N/P < 9, N + P colimitation if 9 ≤ N/P < 22.6, and P only limitation if N/P ≥ 22.6. The results show that eutrophication is favored in shallow lakes, frequently (66.2%) with N limitation while P limitation predominated (94.4%) in most lakes but especially in deep ones. The importance of N limitation increases but P limitation decreases with lake trophic status while N and P colimitation occurs primarily (59.4%) in eutrophic lakes. These results demonstrate that phosphorus reduction can mitigate eutrophication in most large lakes but a dual N and P reduction may be needed in eutrophic lakes, especially in shallow ones (or bays). Our analysis helps clarify the long debate over whether N, P, or both control primary production. While these results imply that more resources be invested in nitrogen management, given the high costs of nitrogen pollution reduction, more comprehensive results from carefully designed experiments at different scales are needed to further verify this modification of the existing eutrophication mitigation paradigm.
富营养化缓解是水生生态系统的一个持续重点。然而,目前的富营养化控制策略(磷 (P) 和/或氮 (N))主要是基于小水体中的养分添加实验指导的,这些实验没有包含与湖泊形态特征主要相关的所有湖泊内生物地球化学过程。在这里,我们使用一个全球湖泊数据集(573 个湖泊)表明,氮与磷在影响富营养化方面的相对作用受水深的支撑。平均深度和最大深度相对于混合深度用于区分本研究中的浅湖(混合深度 > 最大深度)、深湖(混合深度 < 平均深度)和过渡湖(平均深度≤混合深度≤最大深度)。总氮/总磷比(按质量)被用作湖泊潜在养分限制的指标,即,如果 N/P < 9,则仅氮限制;如果 9 ≤ N/P < 22.6,则氮和磷共同限制;如果 N/P ≥ 22.6,则仅磷限制。结果表明,富营养化在浅湖中更为有利,通常(66.2%)存在氮限制,而磷限制在大多数湖泊中占主导地位(94.4%),尤其是在深湖中。随着湖泊营养状态的增加,氮限制的重要性增加而磷限制的重要性降低,而氮和磷共同限制主要发生在富营养湖中(59.4%)。这些结果表明,在大多数大型湖泊中,减少磷可以缓解富营养化,但在富营养湖中,特别是在浅湖中(或海湾中),可能需要同时减少氮和磷。我们的分析有助于澄清关于氮、磷或两者控制初级生产力的长期争论。虽然这些结果意味着需要投入更多的资源来进行氮管理,但鉴于氮污染减少的高成本,需要从不同尺度精心设计的实验中获得更全面的结果,以进一步验证对现有富营养化缓解范式的这一修改。