Department of Neurosurgery, Adiyaman University Education and Research Hospital, Adiyaman, Turkey,
School of Medicine, Adiyaman University, Adiyaman, Turkey.
Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2020;98(1):48-54. doi: 10.1159/000505703. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
The quality of a scientific meeting can be quantified by the rate of full publications arising from the presented abstracts and the impact factor of the journals in which the studies were published.
The aim of this study was to investigate the publication rates of presentations from the 2013 World Society for Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery (WSSFN) quadrennial meeting.
Scopus and PubMed databases were searched for the authors of the presentations to identify full publications arising from the relevant abstracts. Author and content matching were used to match an abstract with a full publication. Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests were used for statistical analysis.
In total, 77% (57/74), 56% (44/79), and 50% (79/157) of the paper, flash, and poster presentations, respectively, have been published, with an overall publication rate of 58% (180/310). Articles received a total of 5,227 citations, with an average of 29 ± 64.1 citations per article. The first authors who published their studies had a significantly higher h-index than those who did not publish (p = 0.003). The most preferred journals for publication were Journal of Neurosurgery, Acta Neurochirurgica, and Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery. The majority of the articles (117/180 [65%]) were published in a quartile 1 or 2 journal. The average journal impact factor (JIF) was 4.5 for all presentations, and 7.8 for paper session presentations. Studies presented in paper sessions were published in significantly higher-impact factor journals than those presented in poster sessions (p < 0.001).
The WSSFN Congress had a relatively high overall publication rate (58%) compared to both other neurosurgical congresses and congresses in other scientific fields. The average JIF of 7.8 is a reflection of the high quality and high impact of the paper session presentations.
科学会议的质量可以通过发表的摘要所产生的全文出版物的比率和发表研究的期刊的影响因子来量化。
本研究旨在调查 2013 年世界立体定向和功能神经外科学会(WSSFN)四年一次的会议的演讲发表率。
在 Scopus 和 PubMed 数据库中搜索演讲者,以确定相关摘要产生的全文出版物。使用作者和内容匹配将摘要与全文出版物匹配。使用 Mann-Whitney U 和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行统计分析。
总共,77%(57/74)、56%(44/79)和 50%(79/157)的论文、Flash 和海报演讲分别已发表,总体发表率为 58%(180/310)。文章共收到 5227 次引用,平均每篇文章 29±64.1 次引用。发表研究的第一作者的 h 指数明显高于未发表的作者(p=0.003)。首选发表期刊为《神经外科学杂志》、《神经外科学学报》和《立体定向和功能神经外科学》。大多数文章(117/180[65%])发表在四分位 1 或 2 期刊上。所有演讲的平均期刊影响因子(JIF)为 4.5,论文演讲的 JIF 为 7.8。论文演讲的发表期刊影响因子明显高于海报演讲(p<0.001)。
与其他神经外科学会和其他科学领域的会议相比,WSSFN 大会的总体发表率(58%)相对较高。7.8 的平均 JIF 反映了论文演讲的高质量和高影响力。