Department of Neuroscience and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas 77030, USA; email:
Annu Rev Neurosci. 2020 Jul 8;43:95-117. doi: 10.1146/annurev-neuro-090919-022842. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
Synaptic plasticity, the activity-dependent change in neuronal connection strength, has long been considered an important component of learning and memory. Computational and engineering work corroborate the power of learning through the directed adjustment of connection weights. Here we review the fundamental elements of four broadly categorized forms of synaptic plasticity and discuss their functional capabilities and limitations. Although standard, correlation-based, Hebbian synaptic plasticity has been the primary focus of neuroscientists for decades, it is inherently limited. Three-factor plasticity rules supplement Hebbian forms with neuromodulation and eligibility traces, while true supervised types go even further by adding objectives and instructive signals. Finally, a recently discovered hippocampal form of synaptic plasticity combines the above elements, while leaving behind the primary Hebbian requirement. We suggest that the effort to determine the neural basis of adaptive behavior could benefit from renewed experimental and theoretical investigation of more powerful directed types of synaptic plasticity.
突触可塑性是神经元连接强度随活动而变化的过程,长期以来一直被认为是学习和记忆的重要组成部分。计算和工程工作通过有针对性地调整连接权重,证实了通过学习获得能力的可能性。在这里,我们回顾了四种广泛分类的突触可塑性的基本要素,并讨论了它们的功能能力和局限性。虽然基于相关的标准赫布型突触可塑性已经成为神经科学家几十年来的主要关注点,但它本质上是有限的。三因素可塑性规则通过神经调质和资格痕迹来补充赫布型形式,而真正的监督类型则更进一步,通过添加目标和指导信号。最后,最近发现的海马体突触可塑性结合了上述要素,同时摒弃了主要的赫布型要求。我们认为,为了确定适应性行为的神经基础,重新进行更强大的定向突触可塑性的实验和理论研究可能会有所帮助。