Suppr超能文献

OSAC 随机对照试验的经济学评价:初级保健中非哮喘急性下呼吸道感染成人使用口服皮质类固醇。

Economic evaluation of the OSAC randomised controlled trial: oral corticosteroids for non-asthmatic adults with acute lower respiratory tract infection in primary care.

机构信息

Bristol Randomised Trials Collaboration, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK

School of Social and Community Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 18;10(2):e033567. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033567.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the costs and outcomes associated with treating non-asthmatic adults (nor suffering from other lung-disease) presenting to primary care with acute lower respiratory tract infection (ALRTI) with oral corticosteroids compared with placebo.

DESIGN

Cost-consequence analysis alongside a randomised controlled trial. Perspectives included the healthcare provider, patients and productivity losses associated with time off work.

SETTING

Fifty-four National Health Service (NHS) general practices in England.

PARTICIPANTS

398 adults attending NHS primary practices with ALRTI but no asthma or other chronic lung disease, followed up for 28 days.

INTERVENTIONS

2× 20 mg oral prednisolone per day for 5 days versus matching placebo tablets.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality-adjusted life years using the 5-level EuroQol-5D version measured weekly; duration and severity of symptom. Direct and indirect resources related to the disease and its treatment were also collected. Outcomes were measured for the 28-day follow-up.

RESULTS

198 (50%) patients received the intervention (prednisolone) and 200 (50%) received placebo. NHS costs were dominated by primary care contacts, higher with placebo than with prednisolone (£13.11 vs £10.38) but without evidence of a difference (95% CI £3.05 to £8.52). The trial medication cost of £1.96 per patient would have been recouped in prescription charges of £4.30 per patient overall (55% participants would have paid £7.85), giving an overall mean 'profit' to the NHS of £7.00 (95% CI £0.50 to £17.08) per patient. There was a quality adjusted life years gain of 0.03 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.05) equating to half a day of perfect health favouring the prednisolone patients; there was no difference in duration of cough or severity of symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of prednisolone for non-asthmatic adults with ALRTI, provided small gains in quality of life and cost savings driven by prescription charges. Considering the results of the economic evaluation and possible side effects of corticosteroids, the short-term benefits may not outweigh the long-term harms.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS

EudraCT 2012-000851-15 and ISRCTN57309858; Pre-results.

摘要

目的

评估与安慰剂相比,在初级保健中治疗急性下呼吸道感染(ALRTI)的非哮喘成年患者(无其他肺部疾病)使用口服皮质类固醇的成本和结果。

设计

一项随机对照试验的成本后果分析。观点包括医疗保健提供者、患者以及与工作相关的生产力损失。

设置

英格兰 54 家国民保健服务(NHS)全科诊所。

参与者

398 名在 NHS 初级诊所就诊的患有 ALRTI 但无哮喘或其他慢性肺部疾病的成年人,随访 28 天。

干预措施

每天 2×20 毫克口服泼尼松龙 5 天,与匹配的安慰剂片相比。

结果

198 名(50%)患者接受了干预(泼尼松龙),200 名(50%)患者接受了安慰剂。NHS 成本主要由初级保健接触决定,与安慰剂相比,使用泼尼松龙的成本更高(£13.11 对 £10.38),但无差异证据(95%CI£3.05 至 £8.52)。每位患者的试验药物成本为 1.96 英镑,通过每位患者的处方收费可收回 4.30 英镑(55%的患者需支付 7.85 英镑),这使 NHS 总体上平均每位患者有 7.00 英镑(95%CI£0.50 至 £17.08)的“利润”。生活质量调整后有 0.03(95%CI0.01 至 0.05)的获益,有利于泼尼松龙患者;咳嗽持续时间或症状严重程度无差异。

结论

对于患有 ALRTI 的非哮喘成年患者,使用泼尼松龙可提高生活质量,并通过处方收费节省成本。考虑到经济评估的结果和皮质类固醇的可能副作用,短期益处可能不会超过长期危害。

试验注册号

EudraCT 2012-000851-15 和 ISRCTN57309858;预结果。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Short-course oral steroids alone for chronic rhinosinusitis.短期口服类固醇单独用于慢性鼻窦炎。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 26;4(4):CD011991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011991.pub2.
9

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验