Pyšek Petr, Čuda Jan, Šmilauer Petr, Skálová Hana, Chumová Zuzana, Lambertini Carla, Lučanová Magdalena, Ryšavá Hana, Trávníček Pavel, Šemberová Kristýna, Meyerson Laura A
Department of Invasion Ecology Institute of Botany Czech Academy of Sciences Průhonice Czech Republic.
Department of Ecology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Czech Republic.
Ecol Evol. 2020 Jan 13;10(3):1106-1118. doi: 10.1002/ece3.5907. eCollection 2020 Feb.
Among the traits whose relevance for plant invasions has recently been suggested are genome size (the amount of nuclear DNA) and ploidy level. So far, research on the role of genome size in invasiveness has been mostly based on indirect evidence by comparing species with different genome sizes, but how karyological traits influence competition at the intraspecific level remains unknown. We addressed these questions in a common-garden experiment evaluating the outcome of direct intraspecific competition among 20 populations of , represented by clones collected in North America and Europe, and differing in their status (native and invasive), genome size (small and large), and ploidy levels (tetraploid, hexaploid, or octoploid). Each clone was planted in competition with one of the others in all possible combinations with three replicates in 45-L pots. Upon harvest, the identity of 21 shoots sampled per pot was revealed by flow cytometry and DNA analysis. Differences in performance were examined using relative proportions of shoots of each clone, ratios of their aboveground biomass, and relative yield total (RYT). The performance of the clones in competition primarily depended on the clone status (native vs. invasive). Measured in terms of shoot number or aboveground biomass, the strongest signal observed was that North American native clones always lost in competition to the other two groups. In addition, North American native clones were suppressed by European natives to a similar degree as by North American invasives. North American invasive clones had the largest average shoot biomass, but only by a limited, nonsignificant difference due to genome size. There was no effect of ploidy on competition. Since the North American invaders of European origin are able to outcompete the native North American clones, we suggest that their high competitiveness acts as an important driver in the early stages of their invasion.
最近有人提出,基因组大小(核DNA的量)和倍性水平等特征与植物入侵有关。到目前为止,关于基因组大小在入侵性中作用的研究大多基于通过比较不同基因组大小的物种获得的间接证据,但染色体特征如何在种内水平上影响竞争仍不清楚。我们在一个共同花园实验中解决了这些问题,该实验评估了20个种群之间直接种内竞争的结果,这些种群由在北美和欧洲收集的克隆代表,在其状态(本地和入侵)、基因组大小(小和大)和倍性水平(四倍体、六倍体或八倍体)方面存在差异。每个克隆都与其他克隆之一以所有可能的组合种植在45升的花盆中,重复三次。收获时,通过流式细胞术和DNA分析揭示每个花盆中采样的21个枝条的身份。使用每个克隆的枝条相对比例、地上生物量比率和相对总产量(RYT)来检查性能差异。克隆在竞争中的表现主要取决于克隆的状态(本地与入侵)。以枝条数量或地上生物量来衡量,观察到的最强信号是北美本地克隆在竞争中总是输给其他两组。此外,北美本地克隆受到欧洲本地克隆的抑制程度与受到北美入侵克隆的抑制程度相似。北美入侵克隆的平均枝条生物量最大,但由于基因组大小的差异有限且不显著。倍性对竞争没有影响。由于起源于欧洲的北美入侵者能够胜过北美本地克隆,我们认为它们的高竞争力是其入侵早期阶段的一个重要驱动因素。