Peiro-Garcia Alejandro, Bourget-Murray Jonathan, Suarez-Lorenzo Isadora, Parsons David, Ferri-de-Barros Fabio
Spine Unit, Hospital Sant Joan de Deu Barcelona, Passeig de Sant Joan de Déu, 2, 08950, Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary, AB, T2N 1N4, Canada.
Spine Deform. 2020 Apr;8(2):317-325. doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00045-0. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
Severe scoliosis, kyphosis, stiffer curves, short trunk height, and poor bone density are known risk factors for instrumentation failure with traditional growing rods or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). To minimize the risk of instrumentation failure in managing complex early-onset scoliosis (EOS) with MCGR, we propose a strategy for staged MCGR insertion.
We performed a single-center retrospective review of all consecutive MCGR cases with 24 months' minimum follow-up. Inclusion criteria included diagnosis of EOS of any etiology with severe and stiff curves in the coronal or sagittal planes, poor bone density, short trunk height (T1-T12 smaller than 150 mm) or previous instrumentation failure managed with staged MCGR. During the first stage, anchor points and halo-gravity were applied, followed by halo-gravity traction. At a second stage, halo-gravity was removed and MCGR were inserted. Outcome measures included pre- and postoperative radiographic measurements and complications.
Seventeen patients with a median age of 7 (range 6-9) years were managed in two stages. Indications for two-stage surgery were short trunk height (T1-T12 height less than 150 mm) in six patients, five poor bone quality, three dislodgement of proximal anchor points in previous instrumentation, and three rigid curves. The rate of unplanned revision surgeries was 11.8%. No infections or traction-related complications were found.
According to our results, the staged MCGR insertion strategy combined with halo-gravity traction to manage complex EOS yielded a relatively low instrumentation failure rate as compared with the rates previously reported in the current literature. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting the staged strategy for instrumentation with MCGR.
IV.
严重脊柱侧弯、后凸畸形、僵硬的侧弯、躯干短小以及骨密度差是传统生长棒或磁控生长棒(MCGR)器械失败的已知风险因素。为了将使用MCGR治疗复杂早发性脊柱侧弯(EOS)时器械失败的风险降至最低,我们提出了一种分期插入MCGR的策略。
我们对所有连续的MCGR病例进行了单中心回顾性研究,随访时间至少为24个月。纳入标准包括任何病因导致的EOS诊断,伴有冠状面或矢状面严重且僵硬的侧弯、骨密度差、躯干短小(T1 - T12小于150毫米)或先前使用分期MCGR治疗的器械失败。在第一阶段,应用锚点和头环 - 重力牵引,随后进行头环 - 重力牵引。在第二阶段,去除头环 - 重力牵引并插入MCGR。观察指标包括术前和术后的影像学测量以及并发症。
17例患者,中位年龄7岁(范围6 - 9岁),分两个阶段进行治疗。两阶段手术的指征为6例患者躯干短小(T1 - T12高度小于150毫米)、5例骨质量差、3例先前器械治疗中近端锚点移位以及3例僵硬侧弯。计划外翻修手术率为11.8%。未发现感染或牵引相关并发症。
根据我们的结果,与当前文献中先前报道的比率相比,分期插入MCGR并结合头环 - 重力牵引治疗复杂EOS的器械失败率相对较低。据我们所知,这是第一项报道MCGR器械分期策略的研究。
IV级