Basu Sonali, Sharron Matthew, Herrera Nicole, Mize Marisa, Cohen Joanna
Divisions of Critical Care Medicine, Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA.
George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA.
J Ultrasound Med. 2020 Aug;39(8):1573-1579. doi: 10.1002/jum.15247. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
The objective of this study was to compare the ultrasound-measured inferior vena cava distensibility index (IVCdi), inferior vena cava distensibility variability (IVCdv), and inferior vena cava-to-aorta ratio (IVC/Ao) to other common methods to assess fluid status in mechanically ventilated pediatric critically ill patients. These methods include central venous pressure (CVP), percent fluid overload by weight (%FOw), and percent fluid overload by volume (%FOv).
This was a prospective observational study of a convenience sample of 50 mechanically ventilated pediatric patients. Ultrasound measurements of the inferior vena cava and aorta were obtained, and the IVCdi, IVCdv, and IVC/Ao were calculated and compared to CVP, %FOw, and %FOv.
The median %FOw was 5%, and the median %FOv was 10%. The mean CVP ± SD was 8.6 ± 4 mm Hg. The CVP had no significant correlation with %FOw or %FOv. There was no significant correlation of the IVCdi with CVP (r = -0.145; P = .325) or %FOv (r = 0.119; P = .420); however, the IVCdi had a significant correlation with %FOw (P = .012). There was also no significant relationship of the IVCdv with CVP (r = -0.135; P = .36) or %FOv (r = 0.128; P = .385); however, there was a significant correlation between the IVCdv and %FOw (P = .012). There was no relationship between the IVC/Ao and any other measures of fluid status.
In this cohort of mechanically ventilated pediatric intensive care unit patients, many commonly used markers of fluid status showed weak correlations with each other. The IVCdi and IVCdv significantly correlated with %FOw and may have potential as markers for fluid overload in this patient population.
本研究的目的是比较超声测量的下腔静脉扩张指数(IVCdi)、下腔静脉扩张变异性(IVCdv)和下腔静脉与主动脉比值(IVC/Ao)与其他评估机械通气小儿危重症患者液体状态的常用方法。这些方法包括中心静脉压(CVP)、体重液体超负荷百分比(%FOw)和容积液体超负荷百分比(%FOv)。
这是一项对50例机械通气小儿患者的便利样本进行的前瞻性观察研究。获取下腔静脉和主动脉的超声测量值,计算IVCdi、IVCdv和IVC/Ao,并与CVP、%FOw和%FOv进行比较。
%FOw的中位数为5%,%FOv的中位数为10%。CVP的平均值±标准差为8.6±4mmHg。CVP与%FOw或%FOv无显著相关性。IVCdi与CVP(r = -0.145;P = 0.325)或%FOv(r = 0.119;P = 0.420)无显著相关性;然而,IVCdi与%FOw有显著相关性(P = 0.012)。IVCdv与CVP(r = -0.135;P = 0.36)或%FOv(r = 0.128;P = 0.385)也无显著关系;然而,IVCdv与%FOw之间存在显著相关性(P = 0.012)。IVC/Ao与任何其他液体状态指标之间均无关系。
在这组机械通气的儿科重症监护病房患者中,许多常用的液体状态标志物相互之间的相关性较弱。IVCdi和IVCdv与%FOw显著相关,可能有潜力作为该患者群体液体超负荷的标志物。