Dept of Cardiovascular, Neural and Metabolic Sciences, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy.
These authors are joint co-authors.
Eur Respir J. 2020 May 7;55(5). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01945-2019. Print 2020 May.
The treatment for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or mandibular advancement devices (MADs) is associated with blood pressure (BP) reduction; however, the overall effect is modest. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the effect of such treatments on BP was to identify subgroups of patients who respond best to treatment.The article search was performed in three different databases with specific search terms and selection criteria. From 2289 articles, we included 68 RCTs that compared CPAP or MADs with either passive or active treatment. When all the studies were pooled together, CPAP and MADs were associated with a mean BP reduction of -2.09 (95% CI -2.78- -1.40) mmHg for systolic BP and -1.92 (95% CI -2.40- -1.43) mmHg for diastolic BP and -1.27 (95% CI -2.34- -0.20) mmHg for systolic BP and -1.11 (95% CI -1.82- -0.41) mmHg for diastolic BP, respectively. The subgroups of patients who showed a greater response were those aged <60 years (systolic BP -2.93 mmHg), with uncontrolled BP at baseline (systolic BP -4.14 mmHg) and with severe oxygen desaturations (minimum arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry <77%) at baseline (24-h systolic BP -7.57 mmHg).Although this meta-analysis shows that the expected reduction of BP by CPAP/MADs is modest, it identifies specific characteristics that may predict a pronounced benefit from CPAP in terms of BP control. These findings should be interpreted with caution; however, they are particularly important in identifying potential phenotypes associated with BP reduction in patients treated for OSA.
持续气道正压通气(CPAP)或下颌前伸装置(MADs)治疗阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)与血压(BP)降低有关;然而,整体效果是适度的。本系统评价和随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析的目的是比较这些治疗方法对 BP 的影响,以确定对治疗反应最好的患者亚组。文章检索在三个不同的数据库中进行,使用特定的检索词和选择标准。从 2289 篇文章中,我们纳入了 68 项比较 CPAP 或 MADs 与被动或主动治疗的 RCT。当所有研究合并在一起时,CPAP 和 MADs 与收缩压平均降低 -2.09(95%CI-2.78-1.40)mmHg 和舒张压平均降低-1.92(95%CI-2.40-1.43)mmHg 相关,分别收缩压平均降低-1.27(95%CI-2.34-0.20)mmHg 和舒张压平均降低-1.11(95%CI-1.82-0.41)mmHg。表现出更大反应的患者亚组为年龄<60 岁(收缩压-2.93mmHg)、基线时血压未得到控制(收缩压-4.14mmHg)和基线时严重低氧饱和度(脉搏血氧饱和度仪测量的最低动脉血氧饱和度<77%)(24 小时收缩压-7.57mmHg)。虽然本荟萃分析表明 CPAP/MADs 预期的 BP 降低幅度适度,但它确定了可能预测 CPAP 在血压控制方面显著获益的特定特征。这些发现应谨慎解释;然而,在确定与 OSA 治疗患者 BP 降低相关的潜在表型方面,它们尤其重要。