Department of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Institute of Sport and Exercise Sciences.
Work Unit Pedagogical Assessment and Potential Development, Institute of Education, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Clin J Pain. 2020 Jun;36(6):480-494. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000818.
Before an intervention can be implemented to improve pain-related self-efficacy, assessment is required. The aim of the present study was to provide a systematic review on which self-efficacy scales are being used among patients with back pain and to evaluate their psychometric properties.
A systematic search was executed in January 2019 and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2009 checklist served as a guide for conducting the study. Electronic databases included Cinahl, Medline, PubMed, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, and SportDiscus. Publications in English or German language that focused on the adult patient population with back pain and which provided validation or reliability measures on pain-related self-efficacy were included.
A total of 3512 records were identified resulting in 671 documents after duplicates were removed. A total of 233 studies were screened full-text, and a total of 47 studies addressing 19 different measures of pain-related self-efficacy were included in the quality analysis. The most commonly used instruments were the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire and the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale. All studies reported internal consistency, but many studies lacked other aspects of reliability and validity.
Further research should focus on assessing validity and interpretability of these questionnaires, especially in pain-related target groups. Researchers should select questionnaires that are most appropriate for their study aims and the back pain population and contribute to further validation of these scales to best predict future behavior and develop intervention programs. This systematic review aids selection of pain-related assessment tools in back pain both in research and practice.
在实施改善疼痛相关自我效能的干预措施之前,需要进行评估。本研究的目的是对用于腰痛患者的自我效能量表进行系统评价,并评估其心理测量特性。
2019 年 1 月进行了系统检索,并按照《系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 2009 清单》的指导进行了研究。电子数据库包括 Cinahl、Medline、PubMed、PsycINFO、PSYNDEX 和 SportDiscus。纳入的出版物为英文或德文,聚焦于腰痛的成年患者人群,并提供了疼痛相关自我效能的验证或可靠性措施。
共确定了 3512 条记录,去除重复项后得到 671 份文件。对 233 项研究进行了全文筛选,共有 47 项研究涉及 19 种不同的疼痛相关自我效能测量方法,纳入了质量分析。最常用的工具是疼痛自我效能问卷和慢性疼痛自我效能量表。所有研究都报告了内部一致性,但许多研究缺乏其他可靠性和有效性方面的内容。
进一步的研究应集中于评估这些问卷的有效性和可解释性,特别是在疼痛相关的目标人群中。研究人员应根据研究目的和腰痛人群选择最合适的问卷,并对这些量表进行进一步验证,以最好地预测未来的行为并制定干预计划。本系统评价有助于在腰痛的研究和实践中选择与疼痛相关的评估工具。