Hassanein Passant H, Khalil Amani, Talaat Dalia M
Quintessence Int. 2020;51(4):310-317. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.a44145.
This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of DentalVibe in pain reduction during local anesthetic injection compared to traditional injection in pediatric patients.
This cross-over randomized controlled clinical trial included a sample of 60 children, aged 5 to 7 years, who were selected based on the need for local anesthesia for bilateral mandibular pulpotomy treatment. They were randomly allocated into two groups. Each group received two mandibular nerve block injections, with a 2-week interval as the washing out period. At first appointment, mandibular nerve block injection was performed either with vibration using DentalVibe at the injection site or benzocaine gel 20% applied before local anesthetic injection; the alternative technique was used at the second appointment. In each visit subjective pain was evaluated using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale and objective pain was evaluated using the FLACC (Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability) scale.
Assessment using the Wong-Baker FACES Pain Rating Scale showed that the mean pain levels in DentalVibe and traditional injection groups were 0.80 ± 1.34 and 2.60 ± 3.22, respectively. The mean pain levels according to the FLACC scale were 2.20 ± 2.04 and 3.13 ± 2.30 in the DentalVibe and traditional injection groups, respectively. Both scales showed statistically significant differences between the two groups in favor of DentalVibe (P < .001). A positive significant correlation between the two scales in the two interventions was recorded, where the Spearman rho was 0.41 for the DentalVibe group, and 0.52 for traditional injection group (P < .001).
Compared to the traditional approach, DentalVibe reduced pain sensation during mandibular nerve block injection in pediatric patients.
本研究旨在评估与传统注射方法相比,DentalVibe在儿科患者局部麻醉注射过程中减轻疼痛的效果。
这项交叉随机对照临床试验纳入了60名5至7岁的儿童样本,这些儿童因双侧下颌牙髓切断术治疗需要局部麻醉而入选。他们被随机分为两组。每组接受两次下颌神经阻滞注射,间隔2周作为洗脱期。在首次就诊时,在下颌神经阻滞注射时,一组在注射部位使用DentalVibe进行振动,另一组在局部麻醉注射前涂抹20%的苯佐卡因凝胶;第二次就诊时使用另一种技术。每次就诊时,使用面部表情疼痛评分量表评估主观疼痛,使用面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、安慰度(FLACC)量表评估客观疼痛。
使用面部表情疼痛评分量表评估显示,DentalVibe组和传统注射组的平均疼痛水平分别为0.80±1.34和2.60±3.22。根据FLACC量表,DentalVibe组和传统注射组的平均疼痛水平分别为2.20±2.04和3.13±2.30。两个量表均显示两组之间存在统计学上的显著差异,支持DentalVibe(P <.001)。记录到两种干预措施中两个量表之间存在显著正相关,其中DentalVibe组的Spearman相关系数为0.41,传统注射组为0.52(P <.001)。
与传统方法相比,DentalVibe可减轻儿科患者下颌神经阻滞注射时的疼痛感。