Área de Biodiversidad y Conservación, Departamento de Biología, Geología, Física y Química Inorgánica, ESCET, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, c/Tulipán s/n, 28933, Móstoles, Spain.
Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 1760, 370 05, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
Ecology. 2020 Jun;101(6):e03017. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3017. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
Traditional approaches in trait-based community ecology typically expect that trait filtering across broad environmental gradients is largely due to replacement of species, rather than intraspecific trait adjustments. Recently, the role of intraspecific trait variability has been largely highlighted as an important contributor mediating the ability of communities to persist under changing conditions and determining the community-level trait variation, particularly across limited environmental gradients. Unfortunately, few studies quantify the relative importance of species turnover versus intraspecific variability mediating the response of communities different from vascular plants. Here, we studied the functional changes in epiphytic lichen communities within 23 beech forests across large latitudinal (ca. 3,000 km) and environmental gradients in Europe to quantify the relative contribution of species turnover and intraspecific variability and the role of climate controlling community-level trait changes. For 58 lichen species, we focused on a set of 10 quantitative functional traits potentially affected by climatic conditions and related to photosynthetic performance (n = 1,184 thalli), water use strategy (n = 1,018 thalli), and nutrient uptake (n = 1,179 thalli). Our results showed that intraspecific trait variability explained most of the functional changes in lichen communities in response to the latitudinal gradient. Further, such functional changes were determined by the covariation between intraspecific trait variability and species turnover, which varied in sign depending on the trait considered. Finally, different climatic predictors explained functional variation due to both intraspecific trait variability and species turnover. We propose that lichen communities cope with contrasting climatic conditions by adjusting the functional trait values of the most abundant species within the communities rather than by the replacement of the species. Consequently, intraspecific variability should be explicitly incorporated to understand the effect of environmental changes on lichen communities, even over large environmental variations, better. Our results challenge the universality of the hypothesis that species turnover chiefly drives functional trait changes across large environmental gradients and call for a wider test of such important assumptions in trait ecology in different organism types and ecosystems.
传统的基于特征的群落生态学方法通常认为,在广泛的环境梯度上的特征过滤主要是由于物种的替代,而不是种内特征的调整。最近,种内特征可变性的作用已被广泛强调为一个重要的因素,它调节了群落在变化的条件下持续存在的能力,并决定了群落水平的特征变化,特别是在有限的环境梯度上。不幸的是,很少有研究量化物种更替与种内可变性在介导不同于维管植物的群落响应方面的相对重要性。在这里,我们研究了欧洲 23 个山毛榉林中的附生地衣群落的功能变化,这些山毛榉林横跨了很大的纬度(约 3000 公里)和环境梯度,以量化物种更替和种内可变性的相对贡献以及气候对控制群落水平特征变化的作用。对于 58 种地衣物种,我们集中研究了一组 10 个潜在受气候条件影响并与光合作用性能(n=1184 个叶状体)、水分利用策略(n=1018 个叶状体)和养分吸收(n=1179 个叶状体)有关的定量功能特征。我们的结果表明,种内特征可变性解释了地衣群落对纬度梯度的功能变化的大部分。此外,这种功能变化是由种内特征可变性和物种更替之间的共变决定的,这种共变的符号取决于所考虑的特征。最后,不同的气候预测因子解释了由于种内特征可变性和物种更替而产生的功能变异。我们提出,地衣群落通过调整群落中最丰富物种的功能特征值来应对不同的气候条件,而不是通过物种的更替来应对。因此,即使在较大的环境变化范围内,也应明确纳入种内可变性,以更好地理解环境变化对地衣群落的影响。我们的结果挑战了物种更替主要驱动大环境梯度上功能特征变化的假说的普遍性,并呼吁在不同的生物类型和生态系统中对特征生态学中的这种重要假设进行更广泛的测试。