Department of Optometry and Vision Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2020 Mar;40(2):117-127. doi: 10.1111/opo.12674. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
It is more difficult to perceive the direction of motion of larger, high contrast patterns than smaller, low contrast patterns due to spatial suppression. Spatial suppression of motion is considered important to the segmentation of moving objects in the visual environment. Previous studies have shown that such spatial suppression of motion is reduced in older adults in central vision, to the extent that older adults can have better sensitivity than younger adults for foveally presented stimuli. Our study was designed to explore whether spatial suppression of motion is similarly reduced for older adults in parafoveal regions and whether divided attention impacts on suppression strength because attention is known to impact on spatial interactions.
Twenty younger (19-34 years) and 18 older (61-77 years) adults completed a single task, where observers identified the direction of a drifting Gabor patch of variable size (σ of the Gaussian envelope = 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4°) presented at 10 degrees of visual angle while observing a central fixation marker, and a dual task, where observers were required to divide their attention across two stimuli, the peripheral drifting Gabor patch and a central rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) stream.
Older adults showed increased spatial suppression of motion relative to younger adults for both tasks (main effect of group: p < 0.001). Dividing attention elevated thresholds for both age groups to a similar extent (main effect of attention: p = 0.002), but did not specifically alter spatial interactions (group x attention interaction: p = 0.13).
Older adults require significantly longer than younger adults to correctly identify stimulus motion, and demonstrate increased spatial suppression of motion, in peripheral vision. When considered alongside previous evidence for reduced suppression for central fixation, our study provides evidence for substantial differences between foveal and parafoveal mechanisms of spatial suppression.
由于空间抑制,较大、高对比度的图案的运动方向感知比较小、低对比度的图案更难。运动的空间抑制被认为对视觉环境中运动物体的分割很重要。先前的研究表明,在中央视觉中,老年人的这种运动空间抑制会减少,以至于老年人对中央呈现的刺激的敏感度可能比年轻人更高。我们的研究旨在探索老年人在旁中心区域的运动空间抑制是否也会减少,以及注意力是否会影响抑制强度,因为注意力已知会影响空间相互作用。
20 名年轻(19-34 岁)和 18 名年长(61-77 岁)成年人在一项单一任务中完成了任务,观察者在观察中央固定标记的同时,识别一个变化大小的漂移 Gabor 补丁的方向(高斯包络的σ= 0.5、1、2、3、4°),该 Gabor 补丁出现在 10 度的视角,并且在双重任务中,观察者需要将注意力分配到两个刺激上,即外围漂移 Gabor 补丁和中央快速串行视觉呈现(RSVP)流。
与年轻成年人相比,年长成年人在这两项任务中都表现出更大的运动空间抑制(组间主效应:p<0.001)。注意力分散使两个年龄组的阈值都升高到相似的程度(注意力主效应:p=0.002),但并没有特别改变空间相互作用(组间注意力交互作用:p=0.13)。
与年轻成年人相比,年长成年人需要更长的时间才能正确识别刺激运动,并且在周边视觉中表现出更大的运动空间抑制。结合之前对中央注视时抑制减少的证据,我们的研究为中央和旁中心区域的空间抑制机制之间存在显著差异提供了证据。