• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

症状性颈动脉狭窄颈动脉内膜切除术的及时性和结果:单中心审计。

Timeliness and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a single centre audit.

机构信息

Department of Vascular, Endovascular and Transplant Surgery, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.

出版信息

ANZ J Surg. 2020 Mar;90(3):345-349. doi: 10.1111/ans.15757. Epub 2020 Feb 20.

DOI:10.1111/ans.15757
PMID:32080950
Abstract

BACKGROUND

For patients presenting with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery is recommended to be performed generally within a 48-hr to 14-day window. This study aimed to assess timeliness of delivery, and outcomes, of CEA surgery in a tertiary vascular centre.

METHOD

Patients with symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis who underwent CEA between 1 June 2014 and 31 June 2017 were identified and data were obtained from hospital records. The timeline of their journey from presentation to surgery was then mapped together with their outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-two cases were included in the study. Overall, the median time from development of presenting symptoms to surgery was 9 days and 119 (69%) cases were operated on within 14 days. The median time from development of presenting symptoms to ultrasound imaging was 2 days and the median time from symptoms to vascular referral was also 2 days. There were no deaths, strokes or transient ischaemic attacks within 30 days of CEA. At 1 year, survival was 100% but 15 (8.7%) had experienced at least one transient ischaemic attack or stroke. In the 53 cases operated upon beyond 14 days the dominant cause of delay in 32 (60%) was accessing surgery after review by the vascular service.

CONCLUSION

The aim of delivering CEA within 14 days of developing relevant symptoms was achieved in most cases with good outcomes. Nevertheless, points of delay in the patient journey that could be targeted for future quality improvement were identified.

摘要

背景

对于出现症状性颈内动脉狭窄的患者,一般建议在 48 小时至 14 天的时间窗内进行颈动脉内膜切除术 (CEA) 手术。本研究旨在评估一家三级血管中心 CEA 手术的及时性和结果。

方法

从 2014 年 6 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 31 日期间,确定了接受 CEA 治疗的症状性颈内动脉狭窄患者,并从医院记录中获取数据。然后,将他们从出现症状到手术的时间线与他们的结果进行映射。

结果

本研究共纳入 172 例患者。总体而言,从出现症状到手术的中位时间为 9 天,119 例(69%)患者在 14 天内接受了手术。从出现症状到进行超声检查的中位时间为 2 天,从出现症状到血管转介的中位时间也是 2 天。CEA 后 30 天内无死亡、中风或短暂性脑缺血发作。1 年后,存活率为 100%,但有 15 例(8.7%)经历了至少一次短暂性脑缺血发作或中风。在超过 14 天接受手术的 53 例中,32 例(60%)的主要延迟原因是在血管科审查后才进行手术。

结论

大多数情况下,实现了在出现相关症状后 14 天内进行 CEA 的目标,并且结果良好。然而,仍确定了患者就诊过程中的一些延误点,可以作为未来质量改进的目标。

相似文献

1
Timeliness and outcomes of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a single centre audit.症状性颈动脉狭窄颈动脉内膜切除术的及时性和结果:单中心审计。
ANZ J Surg. 2020 Mar;90(3):345-349. doi: 10.1111/ans.15757. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
2
Early Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Stenosis of Internal Carotid Artery in Patients Affected by Transient Ischemic Attack or Minor-to-Moderate Ischemic Acute Stroke: A Single-Center Experience.短暂性脑缺血发作或轻度至中度缺血性急性卒中患者症状性颈内动脉狭窄的早期颈动脉内膜切除术:单中心经验
Ann Vasc Surg. 2020 May;65:232-239. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2019.10.088. Epub 2019 Nov 6.
3
Low Risk of Neurological Recurrence while Awaiting Carotid Endarterectomy: Results From a Danish Multicentre Study.颈动脉内膜切除术等待期间神经复发风险低:来自丹麦多中心研究的结果。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2021 Aug;62(2):160-166. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2021.04.016. Epub 2021 Jun 11.
4
Outcomes after early and delayed carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者行颈动脉内膜切除术的早期和延迟治疗结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;67(4):1110-1119.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.09.021. Epub 2017 Dec 8.
5
Primary stroke unit treatment followed by very early carotid endarterectomy for carotid artery stenosis after acute stroke.急性卒中后采用初级卒中单元治疗,随后对颈动脉狭窄进行极早期颈动脉内膜切除术。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2006;22(4):276-81. doi: 10.1159/000094016. Epub 2006 Jun 20.
6
Safety of early endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: an international multicenter study.症状性颈动脉狭窄患者早期颈动脉内膜切除术的安全性:一项国际多中心研究。
Eur J Neurol. 2014 Oct;21(10):1251-7, e75-6. doi: 10.1111/ene.12461. Epub 2014 May 17.
7
Very urgent carotid endarterectomy does not increase the procedural risk.急诊颈动脉内膜切除术不会增加手术风险。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Feb;49(2):129-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.09.006. Epub 2014 Oct 27.
8
Wait times among patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis requiring carotid endarterectomy for stroke prevention.有症状的颈动脉狭窄患者需要颈动脉内膜切除术预防中风的等待时间。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Sep;56(3):661-7.e1-2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 May 16.
9
Outcomes of urgent carotid endarterectomy for stable and unstable acute neurologic deficits.急行颈动脉内膜切除术治疗稳定和不稳定的急性神经功能缺损的结果。
J Vasc Surg. 2014 Feb;59(2):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.08.035. Epub 2013 Nov 16.
10
Rapid access carotid endarterectomy: winning the RACE following a natural disaster.快速通道颈动脉内膜切除术:在自然灾害后赢得这场“竞赛”
N Z Med J. 2016 Oct 14;129(1443):53-60.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiomic Landscape of Extracellular Vesicles in Human Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaque Reveals Endothelial Communication Networks.人类颈动脉粥样硬化斑块中细胞外囊泡的多组学图谱揭示了内皮细胞通讯网络。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2025 Jul;45(7):1277-1305. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.124.322324. Epub 2025 May 29.
2
Frequency of inter-specialty consensus decisions and adherence to advice following discussion at a weekly neurovascular multidisciplinary meeting.每周一次的神经血管多学科会议讨论后,各专科之间达成共识的决策频率和对建议的遵从情况。
Ir J Med Sci. 2023 Dec;192(6):3051-3062. doi: 10.1007/s11845-023-03319-4. Epub 2023 Apr 21.
3
Safety of Carotid Endarterectomy for Symptomatic Stenosis by Age: Meta-Analysis With Individual Patient Data.
颈动脉内膜切除术治疗症状性狭窄的安全性与年龄的关系:荟萃分析与个体患者数据。
Stroke. 2023 Feb;54(2):457-467. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.122.040819. Epub 2023 Jan 17.