• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响血栓形成的透析通路移植物行血管内血栓消融术结局的因素:从就诊到血管造影床旁时间及其他因素?

Factors influencing outcomes of rheolytic thrombectomy on thrombosed dialysis access grafts: Door to angiographic bed time and what else?

作者信息

Ierardi Anna Maria, Carnevale Aldo, Coppola Andrea, Renzulli Matteo, Crippa Matteo, Fumarola Enrico Maria, Golfieri Rita, Giganti Melchiore, Carrafiello Gianpaolo

机构信息

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology Department, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.

Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2020 Sep;21(5):738-745. doi: 10.1177/1129729820904911. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1177/1129729820904911
PMID:32081070
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the time interval from clinical presentation of arteriovenous graft thrombosis and the thrombectomy procedure by the AngioJet system in terms of technical and clinical success and to identify factors influencing success.

METHODS

A total of 60 consecutive patients (35 men and 25 women; mean age = 52 ± 7.89 years) who had undergone percutaneous thrombectomy by the AngioJet device from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively enrolled. Demographics and fistula data, previous treatments, time from clinical onset of thrombosis to intervention, procedural details and complications were recorded. Technical and clinical success and primary and secondary patency rates were calculated. One-way analysis of variance was performed to test any correlation between patient-related and fistula/procedure-related variables and technical/clinical success. Odds ratio and relative risk were also calculated when necessary.

RESULTS

Technical success and clinical success were 95% and 91.7%, respectively. Post-interventional primary and secondary patency rates at 1 year were 72.5% and 84.3%, respectively. Complication rate was 6.7%. One-way analysis of variance showed that clinical success was higher in patients with no previous treatment (p = 0.015). Furthermore, clinical success was significantly associated with door to angiographic bed time (p = 0.002): p-value for the 24-h and the 72-h cut-off was 0.012 and 0.006, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy is safe and effective for thrombosed arteriovenous grafts, with acceptable primary and secondary patency rates. Higher clinical success was found in patients never treated before and when the procedure was carried out within 24 h from the clinical onset of thrombosis.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨动静脉移植物血栓形成临床表现至血管腔内血栓切除术(使用AngioJet系统)的时间间隔对技术和临床成功率的影响,并确定影响成功的因素。

方法

回顾性纳入2016年至2019年期间使用AngioJet设备进行经皮血栓切除术的60例连续患者(35例男性和25例女性;平均年龄=52±7.89岁)。记录人口统计学和瘘管数据、既往治疗情况、从血栓形成临床发作到干预的时间、手术细节和并发症。计算技术和临床成功率以及初次和二次通畅率。进行单因素方差分析以检验患者相关和瘘管/手术相关变量与技术/临床成功率之间的任何相关性。必要时还计算比值比和相对风险。

结果

技术成功率和临床成功率分别为95%和91.7%。干预后1年的初次和二次通畅率分别为72.5%和84.3%。并发症发生率为6.7%。单因素方差分析显示,既往未接受治疗的患者临床成功率更高(p = 0.015)。此外,临床成功率与从就诊到血管造影床时间显著相关(p = 0.002):24小时和72小时截断值的p值分别为0.012和0.006。

结论

经皮血栓溶解术治疗血栓形成的动静脉移植物安全有效,初次和二次通畅率可接受。从未接受过治疗的患者以及在血栓形成临床发作后24小时内进行手术时临床成功率更高。

相似文献

1
Factors influencing outcomes of rheolytic thrombectomy on thrombosed dialysis access grafts: Door to angiographic bed time and what else?影响血栓形成的透析通路移植物行血管内血栓消融术结局的因素:从就诊到血管造影床旁时间及其他因素?
J Vasc Access. 2020 Sep;21(5):738-745. doi: 10.1177/1129729820904911. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
2
Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Thrombosis of Dialysis Arteriovenous Fistulae and Grafts Using a Vacuum-Assisted Thrombectomy Catheter: A Multicenter Study.使用真空辅助血栓切除术导管治疗透析动静脉内瘘和移植物急性血栓形成的机械血栓切除术:一项多中心研究
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018 Jul;29(7):993-997. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.02.030. Epub 2018 May 30.
3
Outcomes after endovascular mechanical thrombectomy in occluded vascular access used for dialysis purposes.血管内机械血栓切除术治疗用于透析目的的闭塞血管通路后的结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Mar 1;95(4):758-764. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28730. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
4
Haemodialysis access thrombosis: Outcomes after surgical thrombectomy versus catheter-directed thrombolytic infusion.血液透析通路血栓形成:手术取栓与导管直接溶栓输注后的结局
J Vasc Access. 2018 Nov;19(6):535-541. doi: 10.1177/1129729818761277. Epub 2018 Apr 3.
5
Comparisons of clinical outcomes for thrombectomy devices with different mechanisms in hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas.比较不同机制的取栓装置在血液透析动静脉瘘中的临床效果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2012 Nov 15;80(6):1035-41. doi: 10.1002/ccd.24408. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
6
Timely thrombectomy can improve patency of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas.及时取栓可改善血液透析动静脉瘘的通畅性。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Apr;67(4):1217-1226. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.08.072. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
7
Percutaneous rheolytic thrombectomy of thrombosed autogenous dialysis fistulas: technical results, clinical outcome, and factors influencing patency.自体动静脉内瘘血栓形成的经皮腔内超声消融血栓切除术:技术结果、临床结局及影响通畅率的因素
J Endovasc Ther. 2015 Feb;22(1):80-6. doi: 10.1177/1526602814566378.
8
Vacuum-assisted mechanical thrombectomy in extensively occlusive thrombosis of dialysis arteriovenous grafts with indigo system.使用靛蓝系统对透析动静脉移植物广泛闭塞性血栓形成进行真空辅助机械血栓切除术。
J Vasc Access. 2020 Sep;21(5):673-679. doi: 10.1177/1129729819899264. Epub 2020 Jan 11.
9
Safety and efficacy of the AngioJet device in the treatment of thrombosed arteriovenous fistula and grafts: A systematic review.AngioJet装置治疗血栓形成的动静脉内瘘和移植物的安全性和有效性:一项系统评价。
J Vasc Access. 2018 May;19(3):243-251. doi: 10.1177/1129729818760977. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
10
Clinical effectiveness of open thrombectomy for thrombosed autogenous arteriovenous fistulas and grafts.自体动静脉瘘和移植物血栓形成的开放式血栓切除术的临床效果。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jul;68(1):189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.12.050. Epub 2018 Mar 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Management of Thrombosed Dialysis Access Circuits.血栓形成的透析通路管理。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2023 Sep;46(9):1162-1167. doi: 10.1007/s00270-023-03434-w. Epub 2023 Apr 13.