• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于牛肉生产中疾病预防和控制的非抗生素方法:范围综述。

Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review.

机构信息

Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, University of Guelph, Guelph, OntarioN1G 2W1, Canada.

Centre for Public Health and Zoonoses, University of Guelph, Guelph, OntarioN1G 2W1, Canada.

出版信息

Anim Health Res Rev. 2019 Dec;20(2):128-142. doi: 10.1017/S1466252319000252.

DOI:10.1017/S1466252319000252
PMID:32081121
Abstract

Livestock producers are encouraged to reduce the use of antibiotics belonging to classes of medical importance to humans. We conducted a scoping review on non-antibiotic interventions in the form of products or management practices that could potentially reduce the need for antibiotics in beef and veal animals living under intensive production conditions. Our objectives were to systematically describe the research on this broad topic, identify specific topics that could feasibly support systematic reviews, and identify knowledge gaps. Multiple databases were searched. Two reviewers independently screened and charted the data. From the 13,598 articles screened, 722 relevant articles were charted. The number of relevant articles increased steadily from 1990. The Western European research was dominated by veal production studies whereas the North American research was dominated by beef production studies. The interventions and outcomes measured were diverse. The four most frequent interventions included non-antibiotic feed additives, vaccinations, breed type, and feed type. The four most frequent outcomes were indices of immunity, non-specific morbidity, respiratory disease, and mortality. There were seven topic areas evaluated in clinical trials that may share enough commonality to support systemic reviews. There was a dearth of studies in which interventions were compared to antibiotic comparison groups.

摘要

鼓励畜牧业者减少使用对人类具有医学重要性的抗生素类别。我们对可能减少密集生产条件下的牛肉和小牛肉动物对抗生素需求的非抗生素干预措施(以产品或管理实践的形式)进行了范围界定审查。我们的目标是系统地描述这一广泛主题的研究,确定可能支持系统评价的具体主题,并确定知识空白。我们检索了多个数据库。两位评审员独立筛选和图表数据。在筛选的 13598 篇文章中,有 722 篇相关文章被图表化。相关文章的数量从 1990 年开始稳步增加。西欧的研究主要集中在小牛肉生产研究上,而北美的研究则主要集中在牛肉生产研究上。干预措施和测量的结果多种多样。最常使用的四种干预措施包括非抗生素饲料添加剂、疫苗接种、品种类型和饲料类型。最常测量的四个结果是免疫指数、非特异性发病率、呼吸道疾病和死亡率。在临床试验中评估了七个可能具有足够共性以支持系统评价的主题领域。与抗生素对照组进行干预比较的研究很少。

相似文献

1
Non-antibiotic approaches for disease prevention and control in beef and veal production: a scoping review.用于牛肉生产中疾病预防和控制的非抗生素方法:范围综述。
Anim Health Res Rev. 2019 Dec;20(2):128-142. doi: 10.1017/S1466252319000252.
2
Non-antibiotic Approaches for Disease Prevention and Control in Nursery Pigs: A Scoping Review.保育猪疾病预防与控制的非抗生素方法:一项范围综述
Front Vet Sci. 2021 Apr 21;8:620347. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.620347. eCollection 2021.
3
Editorial: Systematic reviews reveal a need for more, better data to inform antimicrobial stewardship practices in animal agriculture.社论:系统评价显示,需要更多更好的数据来为动物农业中的抗菌药物管理实践提供信息。
Anim Health Res Rev. 2019 Dec;20(2):103-105. doi: 10.1017/S1466252319000240.
4
Scoping review of approaches for improving antimicrobial stewardship in livestock farmers and veterinarians.针对改善畜牧农民和兽医的抗菌药物管理的方法的范围综述。
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Jul;180:105025. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105025. Epub 2020 May 11.
5
[Economic importance of antibiotic sale for private food animal practices in Switzerland - example veal production].[瑞士私人食用动物养殖中抗生素销售的经济重要性——以小牛肉生产为例]
Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd. 2020 Jul;162(7):471-480. doi: 10.17236/sat00268.
6
Effects of the novel concept 'outdoor veal calf' on antimicrobial use, mortality and weight gain in Switzerland.新型概念“户外小牛肉犊”对瑞士抗菌药物使用、死亡率和体重增加的影响。
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Mar;176:104907. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.104907. Epub 2020 Feb 1.
7
Risk factors for antimicrobial use in veal calves and the association with mortality.小牛肉犊抗菌药物使用的风险因素及其与死亡率的关系。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Jan;102(1):607-618. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-15211. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
8
Biosecurity practices in Belgian veal calf farming: Level of implementation, attitudes, strengths, weaknesses and constraints.比利时小牛肉犊养殖中的生物安保措施:实施水平、态度、优势、劣势和制约因素。
Prev Vet Med. 2019 Nov 15;172:104768. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2019.104768. Epub 2019 Sep 7.
9
Veterinary drug administration in German veal calves: An exploratory study on retrospective data.德国小牛肉犊牛的兽医药物管理:回顾性数据的探索性研究。
Prev Vet Med. 2020 Oct;183:105131. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2020.105131. Epub 2020 Aug 29.
10
Scoping review to identify potential non-antimicrobial interventions to mitigate antimicrobial resistance in commensal enteric bacteria in North American cattle production systems.范围综述,以确定北美养牛生产系统中减轻共生肠道细菌抗菌药物耐药性的潜在非抗菌干预措施。
Epidemiol Infect. 2016 Jan;144(1):1-18. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815000722. Epub 2015 Apr 23.

引用本文的文献

1
Prospective comparison of the digestive tract resistome and microbiota in cattle raised in grass-fed versus grain-fed production systems.草饲与谷饲生产系统中饲养的牛的消化道抗性组与微生物群的前瞻性比较。
mSphere. 2025 Mar 25;10(3):e0073824. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00738-24. Epub 2025 Feb 14.