Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Centre for Neuroscience of Speech, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Feb 26;63(2):533-551. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00099. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
Purpose Approximately 30% of adults over the age of 50 years present with altered vocal function. Our understanding of how these changes manifest acoustically and perceptually is derived from relatively modest-sized studies using a diversity of tools. Voice changes can arise from the onset of disease or disorder, but also age-related physiological changes, which may not reflect pathology as such. Here, we bring together data on acoustic, perceptual, and instrumental assessments (electroglottography), with the aim of gaining a better understanding of the changes occurring across these measurement domains. We consider these changes in the context of different acoustic features, software programs, and perceptual protocols. Method Studies of voice function in healthy older adults over the age of 50 years were sought. Literature was systematically searched with 746 abstracts reviewed. Forty-seven studies were included in the review. A meta-analysis of included studies compared voice acoustic parameters between sex and age. Sixteen acoustic parameters collected from 1,475 participants were analyzed in the meta-analysis. These included some previously unpublished analyses using data provided by authors of included studies. Results Data from the systematic review suggest that older individuals are perceived to present with higher overall scores of dysphonia and roughness, breathiness, strain, and instability. Acoustically, males have significantly higher scores on measures of perturbation, including noise-to-harmonic ratio and absolute jitter. The meta-analysis outcomes suggest that participants aged 80-89 years produce significantly higher fundamental frequency, jitter percent, shimmer percent, and shimmer in decibels compared to participants aged 60-69 years and a significant increase in relative average perturbation, jitter percent, and shimmer in decibels compared to participants aged 70-79 years. Limited data were available comparing acoustic measures using the same acoustic software. Conclusions Variations in fundamental frequency and frequency and amplitude perturbation increase as healthy adults age. It was difficult to draw definitive conclusions based on existing literature due to variability in hardware used, limited descriptions of study cohorts, or missing data from statistical analysis. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.11868663.
目的
大约 30%的 50 岁以上成年人存在发声功能改变。我们对这些变化如何在声学和感知上表现的理解来自于相对较小规模的研究,这些研究使用了多种工具。声音的变化可能是由疾病或障碍引起的,但也可能是与年龄相关的生理变化,而这些变化不一定反映病理学。在这里,我们结合了声学、感知和仪器评估(声门图)的数据,旨在更好地了解这些测量领域的变化。我们考虑了这些变化在不同声学特征、软件程序和感知协议下的情况。
方法
寻找 50 岁以上健康老年人的声音功能研究。系统地搜索文献,共审查了 746 篇摘要。综述纳入了 47 项研究。对纳入研究的元分析比较了性别和年龄对语音声学参数的影响。对 1475 名参与者收集的 16 个声学参数进行了元分析。其中包括一些以前未发表的分析,使用了纳入研究的作者提供的数据。
结果
系统综述的数据表明,老年人被认为表现出更高的整体嗓音障碍程度和粗糙感、呼吸声、紧张感和不稳定性。从声学角度来看,男性在扰动力方面的得分明显高于女性,包括噪声与谐波比和绝对抖动。元分析结果表明,80-89 岁的参与者的基频、抖动百分比、颤抖百分比和分贝级的颤抖明显高于 60-69 岁的参与者,与 70-79 岁的参与者相比,相对平均扰动力、抖动百分比和分贝级的颤抖也显著增加。比较使用相同声学软件的声学测量值的可用数据有限。
结论
随着健康成年人年龄的增长,基频和频率及幅度扰动的变化增加。由于硬件使用的可变性、研究队列描述的有限性或统计分析中缺失的数据,很难根据现有文献得出明确的结论。