Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Hematology and Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Jul 28;58(8):1214-1222. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2019-1172.
Background Monitoring of molecular response (MR) using quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for BCR-ABL1 is a pivotal tool for guiding tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and the long-term follow-up of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). Results of MR monitoring are standardized according to the International Scale (IS), and specific time-dependent molecular milestones for definition of optimal response and treatment failure have been included in treatment recommendations. The common practice to use peripheral blood (PB) instead of bone marrow (BM) aspirate to monitor the MR monitoring in CML has been questioned. Some studies described differences between BCR-ABL1 levels in paired PB and BM specimens. Methods We examined 631 paired PB and BM samples from 283 CML patients in a retrospective single-center study using an IS normalized quantitative reverse transcription (qRT)-PCR assay for quantification of BCR-ABL1IS. Results A good overall concordance of BCR-ABL1IS results was found, a systematic tendency towards higher BCR-ABL1IS levels in PB was observed in samples of CML patients in a major MR. This difference was most pronounced in patients treated with imatinib for at least 1 year. Importantly, the difference resulted in a significantly lower rate of deep MR when BCR-ABL1IS was assessed in the PB compared to BM aspirates. Conclusions In summary, our data suggest that the classification of deep MR in patients with CML is more stringent in PB than in BM. Our study supports the current practice to primarily use PB for long-term molecular follow-up monitoring in CML.
使用实时定量聚合酶链反应(PCR)对 BCR-ABL1 进行分子反应(MR)的背景监测是指导酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗和慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者长期随访的重要工具。MR 监测的结果根据国际标准(IS)进行标准化,并且在治疗建议中包含了用于定义最佳反应和治疗失败的特定时间依赖性分子里程碑。常用的做法是使用外周血(PB)而不是骨髓(BM)抽吸物来监测 CML 的 MR 监测,但这一点受到了质疑。一些研究描述了配对 PB 和 BM 标本中 BCR-ABL1 水平之间的差异。
我们在一项回顾性单中心研究中使用 IS 标准化实时定量逆转录(qRT)-PCR 检测对 283 例 CML 患者的 631 对 PB 和 BM 样本进行了检查,以定量 BCR-ABL1IS。
我们发现 BCR-ABL1IS 结果总体上具有良好的一致性,在主要 MR 中,CML 患者的样本中观察到 PB 中 BCR-ABL1IS 水平呈系统升高的趋势。在至少接受伊马替尼治疗 1 年的患者中,这种差异最为明显。重要的是,当与 BM 抽吸物相比时,在 PB 中评估 BCR-ABL1IS 时,MR 的深度会导致深度 MR 的发生率显著降低。
总之,我们的数据表明,在 CML 患者中,与 BM 相比,在 PB 中对深度 MR 的分类更为严格。我们的研究支持当前的实践,即在 CML 中主要使用 PB 进行长期分子随访监测。