DeMarie-Dreblow D, Miller P H
University of Florida.
Child Dev. 1988 Dec;59(6):1504-13.
Previous research suggests a developmental lag between producing a strategy of selective attention and benefiting from it. This aspect of the transitional period during strategy acquisition was investigated in the present study by comparing recall following child-produced (Session 1) and experimenter-produced (Session 2) strategies. The 114 7-9-year-olds were told to remember a subset of 6 items (either animals or household) located beneath 2 rows of doors. Session 1 assessed each child's spontaneous strategy (pattern of opening doors) over 6 trials. Session 2 included 7 different trial types, during which the experimenter opened the doors, thereby equating the strategies for children of all ages. The results revealed gradual changes in children's ability both to produce and to benefit from a selective strategy. Whereas younger children performed differently on trial types during which only the 6 relevant versus all 12 items were shown, older children recalled a similar number of items for all trial types, regardless of the number or pattern of door openings provided. Adult-produced selectivity eliminated recall differences among the grades and suggested that strategy production is effortful for younger children and therefore may prevent their benefiting from the strategy.
先前的研究表明,在制定选择性注意策略和从中受益之间存在发育滞后。本研究通过比较儿童自主制定策略(第1阶段)和实验者制定策略(第2阶段)后的回忆情况,对策略习得过渡期的这一方面进行了调查。114名7至9岁的儿童被告知要记住位于两排门下方的6个物品子集(动物或家居用品)。第1阶段在6次试验中评估每个儿童的自发策略(开门模式)。第2阶段包括7种不同的试验类型,在此期间实验者开门,从而使所有年龄段儿童的策略相同。结果显示,儿童制定和受益于选择性策略的能力逐渐变化。年幼的儿童在仅展示6个相关物品与展示所有12个物品的试验类型上表现不同,而年长的儿童在所有试验类型中回忆的物品数量相似,无论提供的开门数量或模式如何。成人制定的选择性消除了各年级之间的回忆差异,并表明策略制定对年幼的儿童来说费力,因此可能会妨碍他们从该策略中受益。