Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN; Department of Physical Therapy, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.
Department of Preventive Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN.
J Arthroplasty. 2020 Jun;35(6):1576-1582. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2020.01.057. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
Evidence has established obesity as a risk factor for total knee replacement (TKR) due to osteoarthritis. Obesity is a risk factor for TKR. Randomized trials such as Look AHEAD (Action for Health in Diabetes) have shown long-term successful weight loss with an intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI). It is unknown, however, if intentional weight loss can reduce the risk of TKR.
Look AHEAD randomized persons aged 45-76 with type 2 diabetes who had overweight or obesity to either an ILI to achieve/maintain 7% weight loss or to standard diabetes support and education (DSE). Reported knee pain was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale and Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index questionnaire in 5125 participants without previous TKR. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to model differences in risk of TKR in relation to randomization group assignment (ILI vs DSE) along with baseline body mass index category and baseline knee pain as potential confounders from baseline through Look AHEAD-Extension.
Baseline mean ± SD Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index knee pain scores did not differ by treatment assignment (ILI: 3.6 ± 2.9, DSE: 3.9 ± 3.0, P = .08); as expected due to randomization. During follow up, the 631 (12%) participants who reported having a TKR were more likely to have been heavier (P < .001) and older (P < .001) at enrollment, but risk of TKR did not differ by treatment group assignment (hazard ratio [HR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91-1.25, P = .43). Heterogeneity of treatment effect was observed according to baseline knee pain (interaction P = .02). In persons without knee pain at baseline, there was a 29% reduced risk of TKR in ILI compared to DSE (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.52-0.96). However, in persons with knee pain at baseline, there was no statistically significant association of treatment assignment with respect to subsequent TKR incidence (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.92-1.33).
Findings suggest that intensive lifestyle change including physical activity, dietary restriction and behavioral changes to achieve weight loss for prevention of TKR may be most effective in preventing TKR prior to the development of knee pain.
有证据表明,肥胖是导致全膝关节置换术(TKR)的一个风险因素,而肥胖又是 TKR 的一个风险因素。例如,“糖尿病行动研究(Look AHEAD)”这样的随机试验表明,通过强化生活方式干预(ILI)可以长期成功地减轻体重。然而,目前尚不清楚有目的的体重减轻是否可以降低 TKR 的风险。
Look AHEAD 将年龄在 45-76 岁之间、患有 2 型糖尿病且超重或肥胖的人群随机分为接受 ILI 以实现/维持 7%体重减轻或接受标准糖尿病支持和教育(DSE)的两组。在没有 TKR 病史的 5125 名参与者中,使用视觉模拟量表和西部安大略省麦克马斯特大学骨关节炎指数问卷评估报告的膝关节疼痛。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型,根据随机分组(ILI 与 DSE)、基线体重指数类别和基线膝关节疼痛来模拟 TKR 风险的差异,这些因素被认为是从基线到 Look AHEAD-Extension 的潜在混杂因素。
基线时,ILI 组和 DSE 组的 Western Ontario McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index 膝关节疼痛评分(ILI:3.6±2.9,DSE:3.9±3.0)没有差异(P=0.08);这是由于随机分组所致。在随访期间,631 名(12%)报告患有 TKR 的参与者在入组时更有可能体重较重(P<.001)和年龄较大(P<.001),但 TKR 的风险与治疗组分配无关(风险比[HR]1.07,95%置信区间[CI]0.91-1.25,P=0.43)。根据基线膝关节疼痛,观察到治疗效果的异质性(交互 P=0.02)。在基线时没有膝关节疼痛的人群中,与 DSE 相比,ILI 组 TKR 的风险降低了 29%(HR 0.71,95%CI 0.52-0.96)。然而,在基线时有膝关节疼痛的人群中,治疗分配与随后 TKR 发生率之间没有统计学意义上的关联(HR 1.11,95%CI 0.92-1.33)。
研究结果表明,包括体育活动、饮食限制和行为改变在内的强化生活方式改变,以减轻体重预防 TKR,可能在膝关节疼痛出现之前最有效地预防 TKR。