Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, Saarland University, 66421, Homburg, Saar, Germany.
Center of Orthopaedic Research, Gabriel-Max-Str. 3, 81545, München, Germany.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2021 Oct;47(5):1627-1634. doi: 10.1007/s00068-020-01318-z. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
The surgical diamond instrumentation (SDI), a precise wet-grinding technology, promised contact healing of press-fit inserted bone and even hyaline cartilage, lacks medium- and long-term results. This retrospective study was conducted to identify risk factors associated with the failure of the technique and the subjective patient outcome.
All patients treated for cartilage defects of the knee or ankle joint using the SDI technology between 2000 and 2012 with a follow-up > 1 year were included. Patients with general joint diseases or joint-related procedures, except for corrective osteotomies, were excluded. A standardized questionnaire (EQ-5D) and a questionnaire-based patient-reported outcome survey were used. Descriptive statistics were applied. A multivariate analysis examining risk factors for joint failure was performed. A p value < 0.05 was considered to indicate significant differences.
87 patients with autologous osteochondral transplantation (68 knee, 19 ankle) were included. The median age was 53 years (IQR 37.5-63.0 years) for knee and 36 years (IQR 27.5-54.0 years) for ankle joints. 57.9% of knee and 55.6% of ankle patients were female. Nine patients (8 knee, 1 ankle) had received arthroplasty. 93.3% of knee and 83.3% of ankle patients had an excellent function or minor disabilities. 73.3% of knee and 64.7% of ankle patients did not require pain medication. The mean EQ-5D score was 0.84 for knee and 0.77 for ankle. Patients with higher age were more likely to receive arthroplasty (p = 0.022).
The SDI technique provides promising results with excellent joint survival rates and satisfying patient-reported outcomes. Failure of the technique might be associated with higher age.
外科钻石仪器(SDI)是一种精确的湿磨技术,承诺接触愈合压配合插入的骨,甚至透明软骨,但缺乏中、长期结果。本回顾性研究旨在确定与该技术失败相关的风险因素以及主观患者结局。
纳入 2000 年至 2012 年间采用 SDI 技术治疗膝关节或踝关节软骨缺损且随访时间大于 1 年的所有患者。排除患有一般关节疾病或除矫正性截骨术以外的关节相关手术的患者。使用标准化问卷(EQ-5D)和基于问卷的患者报告结果调查进行评估。应用描述性统计。进行了多变量分析,以检查关节失败的风险因素。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
纳入 87 例自体软骨移植患者(68 例膝关节,19 例踝关节)。膝关节和踝关节的中位年龄分别为 53 岁(IQR 37.5-63.0 岁)和 36 岁(IQR 27.5-54.0 岁)。57.9%的膝关节和 55.6%的踝关节患者为女性。9 例患者(8 例膝关节,1 例踝关节)接受过关节置换术。93.3%的膝关节和 83.3%的踝关节患者功能良好或仅存在轻度残疾。73.3%的膝关节和 64.7%的踝关节患者无需服用止痛药。膝关节和踝关节的平均 EQ-5D 评分分别为 0.84 和 0.77。年龄较高的患者更有可能接受关节置换术(p=0.022)。
SDI 技术提供了有前途的结果,具有出色的关节生存率和令人满意的患者报告结果。该技术的失败可能与较高的年龄有关。