Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Sophia Children's Hospital, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Hernia. 2020 Dec;24(6):1317-1324. doi: 10.1007/s10029-020-02140-7. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
After closure of laparotomies, sutures may pull through tissue due to too high intra-abdominal pressure or suture tension, resulting in burst abdomen and incisional hernia. The objective of this study was to measure the suture tension in small and large bites with a new suture material.
Closure of the linea alba was performed with small bites (i.e., 5 mm between two consecutive stitches and 5 mm distance from the incision) and large bites (i.e., 10 mm × 10 mm) with Duramesh™ size 0 (2 mm) and PDS II 2-0 in 24 experiments on six porcine abdominal walls. The abdominal wall was fixated on an artificial computer-controlled insufflatable abdomen, known as the 'AbdoMan'. A custom-made suture tension sensor was placed in the middle of the incision.
The suture tension was significantly lower with the small bites technique and Duramesh™ when compared with large bites (small bites 0.12 N (IQR 0.07-0.19) vs. large bites 0.57 N (IQR 0.23-0.92), p < 0.025). This significant difference was also found in favour of the small bites with PDS II 2-0 (p < 0.038). No macroscopic tissue failure was seen during or after the experiments.
Closure of the abdominal wall with the small bites technique and Duramesh was more efficient in dividing suture tension across the incision when compared to large bites. However, suture tension compared to a conventional suture material was not significantly different, contradicting an advantage of the new suture material in the prevention of burst abdomen and incisional hernia during the acute, postoperative phase.
在剖腹手术后,缝线可能会因腹腔内压力过高或缝线张力过大而穿过组织,导致腹部破裂和切口疝。本研究的目的是测量新型缝线材料在小和大缝合时的缝线张力。
在 6 个猪的腹壁上进行 24 个实验,使用 Duramesh™ 0 号(2 毫米)和 PDS II 2-0 在白线处进行小缝合(即两个连续缝线之间 5 毫米,切口 5 毫米)和大缝合(即 10×10 毫米)。腹壁固定在一个名为“AbdoMan”的人工计算机控制的可充气腹部上。在切口中间放置一个定制的缝线张力传感器。
与大缝合相比,小缝合技术和 Duramesh 时的缝线张力显著降低(小缝合 0.12N(IQR 0.07-0.19)与大缝合 0.57N(IQR 0.23-0.92),p<0.025)。使用 PDS II 2-0 时也发现了这种明显的差异(p<0.038)。在实验过程中和实验后均未出现肉眼可见的组织失效。
与大缝合相比,小缝合技术和 Duramesh 在腹部缝合时,缝线张力在切口上的分布更有效。然而,与传统缝线材料相比,缝线张力并没有显著差异,这与新型缝线材料在预防急性术后阶段的腹部破裂和切口疝方面的优势相矛盾。