Department of Hematology, Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Institute of Hematology, National Clinical Research Center for Hematologic Disease, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Beijing, 100044, China.
Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology, Beijing, 100044, China.
Sci China Life Sci. 2020 Oct;63(10):1552-1564. doi: 10.1007/s11427-019-1610-2. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
Prophylactic/preemptive donor lymphocyte infusion (p/pDLI) and intensified conditioning have shown promising results in experimental studies of refractory/relapsed acute leukemia (RRAL), but real-world data remain scarce. We conducted a multicenter, population-based analysis of 932 consecutive patients. The three-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates were 56% for patients receiving both p/pDLI and intensified myeloablative conditioning (MAC) (intenseMAC) and 30% for those who received neither therapy per landmark analysis. Multivariable analyses were run separately for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and p/pDLI treatment was linked to significantly higher LFS than non-DLI for both AML and ALL patients without increasing the nonrelapse mortality. IntenseMAC was associated with significantly lower relapse and higher LFS than nonintensified MAC despite higher nonrelapse mortality rates in ALL, while there was no impact of intenseMAC observed in AML. p/pDLI achieved superior outcomes in both matched-sibling donor (MSD) and haploidentical donor transplantation, while intenseMAC only influenced MSD outcomes. Data suggest that RRAL patients receiving "total therapy" by way of p/pDLI and intensified conditioning treatment have an improved chance for LFS, with p/pDLI being safer with a more extensive impact relative to intenseMAC. Patients with RRAL can tolerate both interventions and achieve a reasonable outcome.
预防性/抢先供者淋巴细胞输注(p/pDLI)和强化预处理在难治/复发急性白血病(RRAL)的实验研究中显示出良好的效果,但真实世界的数据仍然很少。我们进行了一项多中心、基于人群的 932 例连续患者分析。根据 landmark 分析,接受 p/pDLI 和强化清髓性预处理(MAC)(强化 MAC)的患者三年无白血病生存率(LFS)为 56%,而未接受两种治疗的患者为 30%。对急性髓系白血病(AML)和急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)分别进行多变量分析,并发现 p/pDLI 治疗与 AML 和 ALL 患者的非 DLI 相比,LFS 明显更高,而不会增加非复发死亡率。尽管 ALL 中的非复发死亡率较高,但强化 MAC 与非强化 MAC 相比,复发率较低,LFS 较高。在 AML 中未观察到强化 MAC 的影响。p/pDLI 在匹配的同胞供体(MSD)和半相合供体移植中均取得了更好的结果,而强化 MAC 仅影响 MSD 结果。数据表明,接受 p/pDLI 和强化预处理的“总治疗”的 RRAL 患者 LFS 机会更高,p/pDLI 比强化 MAC 更安全,影响更广泛。RRAL 患者可以耐受这两种干预措施,并获得合理的结果。