Graduate School of Public Health Dept. of Public Health Sciences, Institute of Aging, and Institute of Health and Environment, Seoul National University, Seoul, 151-742, Republic of Korea.
National Rehabilitation Center, Seoul, 01022, Republic of Korea.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2020 Feb 22;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12961-020-0529-8.
Limited evidence exists on how to assess long-term care system performance. This study aims to report on the process and results of developing a performance assessment framework to evaluate the long-term care system financed by the public long-term care insurance in South Korea.
The framework was developed through a six-step approach, including setting the goals and scope of performance assessment in the given policy context, reviewing existing performance frameworks, developing a framework with a wide range of potential indicators, refining the framework through a series of Delphi surveys and expert meetings, examining the feasibility of generated indicators through a pilot test, receiving the comments of stakeholders, and finalising the performance framework.
The finalised framework has 4 domains - coverage, quality of care, quality of life and system sustainability - and 28 indicators, including 10 core indicators to monitor long-term care system performance. Usability and feasibility along with policy relevance were important criteria in selecting these indicators. The proposed framework can be used to assess the performance of the long-term care system in Korea, and the framework and its methodological approach can be benchmarks for other countries developing their own framework.
It is critical to reconcile and prioritise various stakeholders' views and information needs as well as to balance methodological rigor with practical usefulness and feasibility in the development and implementation of a long-term care performance monitoring system.
关于如何评估长期护理系统绩效的证据有限。本研究旨在报告为评估韩国公共长期护理保险资助的长期护理系统而制定绩效评估框架的过程和结果。
该框架是通过六步方法制定的,包括在既定政策背景下设定绩效评估的目标和范围、审查现有的绩效框架、制定一个具有广泛潜在指标的框架、通过一系列德尔菲调查和专家会议对框架进行细化、通过试点测试检查生成指标的可行性、征求利益相关者的意见以及最终确定绩效框架。
最终确定的框架有 4 个领域——覆盖范围、护理质量、生活质量和系统可持续性——以及 28 个指标,包括 10 个核心指标来监测长期护理系统的绩效。在选择这些指标时,可用性和可行性以及政策相关性是重要标准。所提出的框架可用于评估韩国长期护理系统的绩效,该框架及其方法学方法可以为其他国家制定自己的框架提供基准。
在制定和实施长期护理绩效监测系统时,协调和优先考虑各种利益相关者的观点和信息需求,以及在方法严谨性与实际有用性和可行性之间取得平衡至关重要。