Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Resuscitation. 2020 Apr;149:127-133. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.01.040. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
The mathematical method used to calculate chest compression (CC) rate during cardiopulmonary resuscitation varies in the literature and across device manufacturers. The objective of this study was to determine the variability in calculated CC rates by applying four published methods to the same dataset.
This study was a secondary investigation of the first 200 pediatric cardiac arrest events with invasive arterial line waveform data in the ICU-RESUScitation Project (NCT02837497). Instantaneous CC rates were calculated during periods of uninterrupted CCs. The defined minimum interruption length affects rate calculation (e.g., if an interruption is defined as a break in CCs ≥ 2 s, the lowest possible calculated rate is 30 CCs/min). Average rates were calculated by four methods: 1) rate with an interruption defined as ≥ 1 s; 2) interruption ≥ 2 s; 3) interruption ≥ 3 s; 4) method #3 excluding top and bottom quartiles of calculated rates. American Heart Association Guideline-compliant rate was defined as 100-120 CCs/min. A clinically important change was defined as ±5 CCs/min. The percentage of events and epochs (30 s periods) that changed Guideline-compliant status was calculated.
Across calculation methods, mean CC rates (118.7-119.5/min) were similar. Comparing all methods, 14 events (7%) and 114 epochs (6%) changed Guideline-compliant status.
Using four published methods for calculating CC rate, average rates were similar, but 7% of events changed Guideline-compliant status. These data suggest that a uniform calculation method (interruption ≥ 1 s) should be adopted to decrease variability in resuscitation science.
心肺复苏过程中胸外按压(CC)频率的计算方法在文献和设备制造商之间存在差异。本研究的目的是通过将四种已发表的方法应用于同一数据集,确定计算出的 CC 频率的可变性。
本研究是 ICU-RESUScitation 项目(NCT02837497)中前 200 例有创动脉线波形数据的儿科心搏骤停事件的二次研究。在不间断 CC 期间计算瞬时 CC 频率。定义的最小中断长度会影响频率计算(例如,如果中断定义为 CC 中断≥2 秒,则可能计算出的最低频率为 30 CC/min)。通过以下四种方法计算平均频率:1)中断定义为≥1 秒的频率;2)中断≥2 秒;3)中断≥3 秒;4)方法 3 排除计算频率的上下四分位数。美国心脏协会指南一致的频率定义为 100-120 CC/min。定义临床重要变化为±5 CC/min。计算符合指南状态变化的事件和时段(30 秒时段)的百分比。
在计算方法中,平均 CC 频率(118.7-119.5/min)相似。比较所有方法,有 14 个事件(7%)和 114 个时段(6%)改变了符合指南的状态。
使用四种已发表的方法计算 CC 频率,平均频率相似,但 7%的事件改变了符合指南的状态。这些数据表明,应采用统一的计算方法(中断≥1 秒)来减少复苏科学中的变异性。