Department of Preventive Physical Therapy, Human Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 53 Kawara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan.
Clin Rheumatol. 2020 Jul;39(7):2207-2217. doi: 10.1007/s10067-020-04988-7. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
Recently, several clinical prognostic factors for hip osteoarthritis (OA) progression such as spinal malalignment, reduced spinal mobility, and excessive daily cumulative hip loading have been identified. This study aimed to identify clinical phenotypes based on clinical prognostic factors in patients with secondary hip OA using data from prospective cohort studies and to define the clinical features of each phenotype.
Fifty patients participated. Two-step cluster analysis was performed to identify the phenotypes using the following potential prognostic factors for hip OA progression: spinal inclination in standing, thoracolumbar spine mobility, daily cumulative hip moment, and minimum joint space width (JSW) at baseline. Comprehensive basic and clinical features (age, body mass index, hip pain, Harris hip score, JSW, radiographic hip morphology, hip impairments, spinal alignment and mobility, and gait-related variables) and ratio of progressors in 12 months were compared among the phenotypes using bootstrap method (unadjusted and adjusted for age).
Three phenotypes were identified and each phenotype was characterized as follows (P < 0.05): phenotype 1 (30%)-relatively young age and higher daily cumulative hip loading; phenotype 2 (42.0%)-relatively older age, reduced JSW, and less spinal mobility; and phenotype 3 (28.0%)-changed thoracic spine alignment and less spinal (especially in the thoracic spine) mobility. The ratio of progressors among the phenotypes was not statistically significantly different. These characteristics remained after adjustment for age.
Three phenotypes with similar progression risk were identified. This finding will help in designing treatment tailored to each phenotype for hip OA progression prevention.Key Points• Three phenotypes with similar progression risk were identified based on clinical prognostic factors.• Phenotype 1 was characterized by young age and higher daily cumulative hip loading.• Phenotype 2 was relatively old age and had reduced JSW and less spinal mobility.• Phenotype 3 had changed thoracic spine alignment and less thoracic spine mobility.
最近,已经确定了一些髋关节骨关节炎(OA)进展的临床预后因素,如脊柱侧凸、脊柱活动度降低和日常累积髋关节负荷过大。本研究旨在使用前瞻性队列研究的数据,根据继发性髋关节 OA 的临床预后因素,确定患者的临床表型,并定义每种表型的临床特征。
50 名患者参与。使用两步聚类分析,根据以下可能影响髋关节 OA 进展的预后因素,确定表型:站立时脊柱倾斜度、胸腰椎活动度、日常累积髋关节力矩和基线时最小关节间隙宽度(JSW)。使用 bootstrap 方法(未调整和调整年龄)比较表型之间的综合基本和临床特征(年龄、体重指数、髋痛、Harris 髋关节评分、JSW、放射学髋关节形态、髋关节障碍、脊柱排列和活动度以及与步态相关的变量)和 12 个月内进展者的比例。
确定了三种表型,每种表型的特征如下(P<0.05):表型 1(30%)-相对年轻和较高的日常累积髋关节负荷;表型 2(42.0%)-相对较老的年龄、较小的 JSW 和较低的脊柱活动度;表型 3(28.0%)-改变的胸椎排列和较低的脊柱(尤其是胸椎)活动度。表型之间的进展者比例没有统计学上的显著差异。这些特征在调整年龄后仍然存在。
根据临床预后因素确定了三种具有相似进展风险的表型。这一发现将有助于为髋关节 OA 进展预防设计针对每个表型的个体化治疗方案。
· 根据临床预后因素确定了三种具有相似进展风险的表型。
· 表型 1 的特征是年轻和较高的日常累积髋关节负荷。
· 表型 2 是相对较老的年龄,较小的 JSW 和较低的脊柱活动度。
· 表型 3 有改变的胸椎排列和较低的胸椎活动度。