Kanitkar Aditi Aneesh, Kanitkar Aneesh Shriram, Sasane Rutuparna S, Patil Seema S, Chopade Swapnil R, Vaidya Seema
Department of Prosthodontics and Implantology, Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharashtra, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jan-Mar;20(1):97-103. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_202_19. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
This study aimed to analyze the effect of different investment techniques and pattern materials on the surface roughness of raw castings from nickel-chromium alloy.
This is an experimental in vitro study carried out in Bharati Vidyapeeth Dental College and Hospital, Sangli, Maharastra.
Sixty square-shaped wax patterns, measuring 10 mm × 10 mm × 2 mm, were divided into four groups. A phosphate-bonded investment material (Bellasun, Bego, Germany) was used to invest 15 samples of inlay wax and kept under normal atmospheric pressure and the remaining 15 wax patterns were invested under a pressure of 3 bars for 30 min, and then allowed to bench set for another 30 min. The same investing techniques were carried out for the remaining thirty samples made from pattern resin.
The surface roughness (μm) of the castings was measured by a profilometer. Student's "unpaired -test" was used for the statistical analysis.
Specimens that were invested at atmospheric pressure had significantly more surface roughness (μm) values than those invested under increased pressure ( < 0.01).
Wax patterns exhibited the least surface roughness when invested under pressure and can be recommended as the material and technique of choice. In addition, resin patterns invested under increased pressure produced smoother casting surface than those invested at atmospheric pressure, and the difference is highly significant.
本研究旨在分析不同包埋技术和铸型材料对镍铬合金原始铸件表面粗糙度的影响。
这是一项在马哈拉施特拉邦桑利市巴拉蒂维迪佩特牙科学院及医院进行的体外实验研究。
将六十个尺寸为10毫米×10毫米×2毫米的方形蜡型分成四组。使用一种磷酸盐粘结包埋材料(Bellasun,贝格,德国)对15个嵌体蜡型进行包埋,使其处于正常大气压下,其余15个蜡型在3个大气压下包埋30分钟,然后再静置30分钟。对另外由树脂型材料制成的三十个样本采用相同的包埋技术。
通过轮廓仪测量铸件的表面粗糙度(μm)。采用学生氏“非配对t检验”进行统计分析。
在大气压下包埋的标本表面粗糙度(μm)值显著高于在增压条件下包埋的标本(P<0.01)。
蜡型在压力下包埋时表面粗糙度最小,可推荐为首选材料和技术。此外,在增压条件下包埋的树脂型材料比在大气压下包埋的树脂型材料产生的铸件表面更光滑,且差异非常显著。