Patel Jwalant Yogesh Kumar, Kundnani Vishal G, Kuriya Suraj, Raut Saijyot, Meena Mohit
Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Spine, Mumbai Institute of Spine Surgery, Bombay Hospital and Medical Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2019 Oct-Dec;10(4):210-215. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_112_19. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
Literature evaluating the efficacy and long-term clinico-radiological outcomes of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and posterior fixation at C2-C3 for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures is scanty.
The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, clinical-radiological outcomes, and complications of ACDF and posterior fixation techniques performed for unstable hangman's fractures.
The study design involves retrospective comparative study.
This study conducted from 2012 to 2018 included 21 patients with unstable hangman's fracture (Levine and Edwards Type II, IIa and III). All patients were divided into two groups based on the approach taken for fracture fixation (Group A-anterior approach and Group B-posterior approach). Peri-operative clinical, radiological parameters, postoperative complications, and outcomes were evaluated and compared in both the groups.
Chi-square test and Student's -test were used.
The mean age was 39.8 ± 4.5 years in-group A and 41.3 ± 6.7 years in-group B. The male patients outnumbered the female patients and road traffic accident was the most common cause of unstable fractures. There were statistical significant differences in surgical time ( = 0.15), operative blood loss, pain-free status postsurgery, and hospital stay ( = 0.15) between two groups. No statistically significant differences noted in clinic-radiological outcomes in the form of visual analog scale and fusion rate at final follow-up between two groups at final follow-up.
The unstable hangman's fractures can be effectively managed with both anterior and posterior approaches with comparable clinico-radiological outcome. A minimally invasive nature, earlier pain-free status, early mobilization with reduced hospitalization make the ACDF efficacious, particularly in cases with no medullary canal in C2 pedicles and traumatic C2-3 disc herniation with listhesis compressing the spinal cord.
评估颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)和C2-C3后路固定治疗不稳定型绞刑者骨折的疗效及长期临床影像学结果的文献较少。
本研究旨在比较ACDF和后路固定技术治疗不稳定型绞刑者骨折的疗效、临床影像学结果及并发症。
本研究设计为回顾性比较研究。
本研究纳入2012年至2018年期间的21例不稳定型绞刑者骨折患者(Levine和Edwards II型、IIa型和III型)。所有患者根据骨折固定方式分为两组(A组-前路入路和B组-后路入路)。对两组患者的围手术期临床、影像学参数、术后并发症及结果进行评估和比较。
采用卡方检验和学生t检验。
A组平均年龄为39.8±4.5岁,B组为41.3±6.7岁。男性患者多于女性患者,道路交通事故是不稳定骨折的最常见原因。两组之间在手术时间(P = 0.15)、术中失血、术后无痛状态及住院时间(P = 0.15)方面存在统计学显著差异。两组在末次随访时,以视觉模拟量表和融合率形式的临床影像学结果方面未发现统计学显著差异。
不稳定型绞刑者骨折采用前路和后路手术均可有效治疗,临床影像学结果相当。ACDF具有微创性、更早的无痛状态、早期活动及缩短住院时间等优点,疗效显著,尤其适用于C2椎弓根无髓腔及伴有创伤性C2-3椎间盘突出伴滑脱压迫脊髓的病例。