Suppr超能文献

选择性非手术治疗孤立性网膜脱出的腹部刺伤安全有效:南非经验。

Selective Nonoperative Management of Abdominal Stab Wounds with Isolated Omental Evisceration is Safe: A South African Experience.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Department of Surgery, North West Deanery, Manchester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Scand J Surg. 2021 Jun;110(2):214-221. doi: 10.1177/1457496920903982. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Selective nonoperative management of abdominal stab wound is well established, but its application in the setting of isolated omental evisceration remains controversial. The aim of the study is to establish the role of selective nonoperative management in the setting of isolated omental evisceration.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted over an 8-year period from January 2010 to December 2017 at a major trauma center in South Africa to determine the outcome of selective nonoperative management.

RESULTS

A total of 405 consecutive cases were reviewed (91% male, mean age: 27 years), of which 224 (55%) cases required immediate laparotomy. The remaining 181 cases were observed clinically, of which 20 (11%) cases eventually required a delayed laparotomy. The mean time from injury to decision for laparotomy was <3 h in 92% (224/244), 3-6 h in 6% (14/244), 6-12 h 2% (4/244), and 12-18 h in 1% (2/244). There was no significant difference between the immediate laparotomy and the delayed laparotomy group in terms of length of stay, morbidity, or mortality. Ninety-eight percent (238/244) of laparotomies were positive and 96% of the positive laparotomies (229/238) were considered therapeutic.

CONCLUSION

Selective nonoperative management for abdominal stab wound in the setting of isolated omental evisceration is safe and does not result in increased morbidity or mortality. Clinical assessment remains valid and accurate in determining the need for laparotomy but must be performed by experienced surgeons in a controlled environment.

摘要

背景与目的

腹部锐器刺伤的选择性非手术治疗已经得到广泛认可,但在单纯网膜脱出的情况下应用仍存在争议。本研究旨在确定选择性非手术治疗在单纯网膜脱出中的作用。

材料与方法

对南非一家大型创伤中心 8 年来(2010 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月)的连续 405 例病例进行回顾性研究,以确定选择性非手术治疗的结果。

结果

共回顾了 405 例连续病例(91%为男性,平均年龄:27 岁),其中 224 例(55%)需要立即剖腹手术。其余 181 例进行了临床观察,其中 20 例(11%)最终需要延迟剖腹手术。92%(224/244)的患者从受伤到决定剖腹手术的时间<3 小时,6%(14/244)的患者为 3-6 小时,2%(4/244)的患者为 6-12 小时,1%(2/244)的患者为 12-18 小时。立即剖腹手术和延迟剖腹手术组在住院时间、发病率或死亡率方面无显著差异。98%(238/244)的剖腹手术为阳性,96%(229/238)的阳性剖腹手术被认为是治疗性的。

结论

在单纯网膜脱出的情况下,腹部锐器刺伤的选择性非手术治疗是安全的,不会增加发病率或死亡率。临床评估在确定是否需要剖腹手术方面仍然有效和准确,但必须由经验丰富的外科医生在受控环境下进行。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验