Center for Law, Energy & the Environment, UC Berkeley School of Law, United States; NSF Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt), United States.
Department of Geography, Portland State University, United States; Center for Law, Energy & the Environment, UC Berkeley School of Law, United States; NSF Engineering Research Center for Re-Inventing the Nation's Urban Water Infrastructure (ReNUWIt), United States.
J Environ Manage. 2020 Apr 15;260:110025. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.110025. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
Despite pressures to increase performance and decrease costs, innovation has been slow to emerge in the municipal wastewater sector. The relationship between regulation and innovation in this sector is a particularly interesting aspect of this conundrum, given the degree to which public utility decision-making is influenced by regulation. Using a national survey, this paper examines US wastewater utility managers' perceptions of how regulation influences the adoption of new technologies. Recognizing that the relationship between innovation and regulation is complex, we develop the concept of regulation as multifaceted and examine three interrelated aspects of regulation: (1) regulatory requirements, (2) regulators and relationships, and (3) the broader regulatory environment. Specifically, we seek to understand whether and in what ways wastewater utility managers perceive these aspects of regulation as hindering or encouraging the adoption of new technologies. We find that, although stringent effluent limitations are perceived to be a moderate barrier to innovation, most survey respondents did not identify weakening them as a way to encourage innovation. Instead, respondents generally identified factors related to regulatory relationships and factors related to the broader regulatory environment as barriers to innovation, and indicated that addressing these aspects of regulation would encourage innovation. We conclude that loosening or tightening regulatory requirements is not the most effective way to promote innovation in the municipal wastewater sector. Rather, those parties with an interest in innovation can focus on helping utilities and regulators build relationships and better navigate the processes that influence decisions about new technologies.
尽管有提高绩效和降低成本的压力,但创新在市政废水领域的出现一直较为缓慢。考虑到公共事业决策在多大程度上受到监管的影响,该部门的监管与创新之间的关系是这一难题的一个特别有趣的方面。本文利用一项全国性调查,考察了美国废水公用事业管理人员对监管如何影响新技术采用的看法。认识到创新与监管之间的关系是复杂的,我们将监管概念化为多方面的,并考察了监管的三个相互关联的方面:(1)监管要求;(2)监管机构和关系;(3)更广泛的监管环境。具体来说,我们试图了解废水公用事业管理人员是否以及在何种程度上认为这些监管方面会阻碍或鼓励新技术的采用。我们发现,尽管严格的废水排放标准被认为是创新的中等障碍,但大多数受访者并没有将放宽这些标准视为鼓励创新的一种方式。相反,受访者普遍认为与监管关系和更广泛的监管环境相关的因素是创新的障碍,并表示解决这些监管方面的问题将鼓励创新。我们的结论是,放宽或收紧监管要求并不是促进市政废水领域创新的最有效途径。相反,那些对创新感兴趣的各方可以专注于帮助公用事业和监管机构建立关系,并更好地应对影响新技术决策的流程。