Suppr超能文献

富马酸氯马斯汀、氯苯那敏和安慰剂治疗季节性变应性鼻炎患者的双盲对照研究

Double-blind, controlled study of clemastine fumarate, chlorpheniramine and placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

作者信息

Thomas J S, Heurich A E, Ralph J W, Crane R, Shepherd D A

出版信息

Ann Allergy. 1977 Mar;38(3):169-74.

PMID:320916
Abstract

A whole body plethysmograph (body box) equipped with a flow meter (see Figure 1) was used for objective quantification of the effects of single doses of clemastine fumarate 2.68 mg, chlorpheniramine 4 mg and placebo in a double-blind study of 48 patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. This technique offers an objective means of assessing drug effects on nasal congestion and obstruction. Before the development of whole body plethysmography, only subjective assessments of antihistamines' effects on nasal blockage or congestion were available. These subjective reports usually noted that nasal blockage or congestion was refractory to antihistamines or minimally relieved by them. However, in this study, nasal and oral airway resistances, each measured by whole body plethysmography, were lowered by clemastine fumarate and chlorpheniramine. These results were corroborated by the patients' and physician's assessments of changes in symptom severity and the physician's evaluation of intranasal photographs taken for each patient. Oral airway resistance of patients treated with clemastine fumarate was improved to a significantly greater extent than in patients receiving placebo. At two hours post-drug, patients receiving clemastine fumarate usually showed a greater response in most assessments than those receiving chlorpheniramine, and the trend of most comparisons was clearly in favor of clemastine fumarate. Patients in all three treatment groups experienced drowsiness but both incidence and severity were lower with clemastine fumarate.

摘要

在一项针对48例季节性变应性鼻炎患者的双盲研究中,使用配备流量计的全身体积描记器(体箱,见图1)客观量化单剂量2.68 mg富马酸氯马斯汀、4 mg氯苯那敏和安慰剂的效果。该技术提供了一种评估药物对鼻充血和阻塞作用的客观方法。在全身体积描记法出现之前,对于抗组胺药对鼻阻塞或充血的作用,仅有主观评估。这些主观报告通常指出,鼻阻塞或充血对抗组胺药无效或仅得到轻微缓解。然而,在本研究中,通过全身体积描记法测量的鼻和口腔气道阻力,富马酸氯马斯汀和氯苯那敏均使其降低。这些结果得到了患者和医生对症状严重程度变化的评估以及医生对为每位患者拍摄的鼻内照片的评估的证实。接受富马酸氯马斯汀治疗的患者的口腔气道阻力改善程度明显大于接受安慰剂的患者。用药后两小时,在大多数评估中,接受富马酸氯马斯汀的患者通常比接受氯苯那敏的患者反应更大,且大多数比较的趋势明显有利于富马酸氯马斯汀。所有三个治疗组的患者均出现嗜睡,但富马酸氯马斯汀的发生率和严重程度均较低。

相似文献

8
Double-blind trials of clemastine ('Tavegil') in allergic rhinitis.
Curr Med Res Opin. 1975;3(3):126-31. doi: 10.1185/03007997509113659.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacologic treatment of rhinitis.鼻炎的药物治疗。
Clin Rev Allergy. 1984 Aug;2(3):237-53. doi: 10.1007/BF02991103.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验