• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

前瞻性研究超声和计算机断层扫描引导下经皮活检在肿瘤患者中的疼痛。

Prospective investigation of pain associated with ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsies in oncological patients.

机构信息

Radiology Department, "Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuţă" Oncology Institute, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

"Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

Med Ultrason. 2020 Mar 1;22(1):65-70. doi: 10.11152/mu-2256.

DOI:10.11152/mu-2256
PMID:32096790
Abstract

AimsThe present study aims to investigate the pain, anxiety and other factors that are associated with percutaneous computed tomography (CT)- and ultrasound (US)-guided biopsies of tumors.Material and MethodsThe study prospectively included 60 consecutive patients, of which 24 underwent CT-guided biopsies and 36 US-guided biopsies. The location of targeted tumors was within the thorax, abdomen, pelvis, and limbs. A questionnaire containing numerical rate scales (0-10) regarding procedural and post-procedural pain, anxiety, and other associated parameters was filled out by each patient 2-6 hours after the procedure. CT and ultrasound parameters were compared.  The two groups were then pooled together in order to compare pain scores per targeted organ and to analyze the parameters that were associated with pain.ResultsThere was no significant difference between the CT and US group with the exception of the positional discomfort, which was higher in the CT group (p=0.003). The average procedural pain score (2.0) was significantly higher than the post-procedural pain (1.3, p=0.006) and the phlebotomy pain (0.8, p<0.0001). There was no significant difference between the targeted organs with regards to the pain score. The factors that showed a positive correlation with the procedural pain were procedure-related anxiety (p=0.005), positional discomfort (p=0.01), and phlebotomy pain (p=0.0008). The pre interventional use of an analgesic was negatively correlated with the procedural pain (p=0.02).ConclusionsCT- and US- guided percutaneous biopsies are associated with low levels of pain that are generally well tolerated by patients irrespective of the targeted organ.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在探讨与经皮 CT(计算机断层扫描)和超声(US)引导下肿瘤活检相关的疼痛、焦虑和其他因素。

材料与方法

本研究前瞻性纳入了 60 例连续患者,其中 24 例行 CT 引导活检,36 例行 US 引导活检。目标肿瘤的位置位于胸部、腹部、骨盆和四肢。每位患者在术后 2-6 小时填写一份包含程序和术后疼痛、焦虑和其他相关参数的数字评分量表(0-10)的问卷。比较 CT 和超声参数。然后将两组合并,以比较每个目标器官的疼痛评分,并分析与疼痛相关的参数。

结果

除了 CT 组的位置不适(p=0.003)高于 US 组外,CT 组和 US 组之间没有显著差异。程序疼痛评分(2.0)明显高于术后疼痛(1.3,p=0.006)和采血疼痛(0.8,p<0.0001)。各目标器官的疼痛评分无显著差异。与程序疼痛呈正相关的因素包括与程序相关的焦虑(p=0.005)、位置不适(p=0.01)和采血疼痛(p=0.0008)。术前使用镇痛药与程序疼痛呈负相关(p=0.02)。

结论

CT 和 US 引导的经皮活检相关的疼痛程度较低,患者普遍能较好地耐受,与目标器官无关。

相似文献

1
Prospective investigation of pain associated with ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided percutaneous biopsies in oncological patients.前瞻性研究超声和计算机断层扫描引导下经皮活检在肿瘤患者中的疼痛。
Med Ultrason. 2020 Mar 1;22(1):65-70. doi: 10.11152/mu-2256.
2
Comparison of procedural anxiety and pain associated with conventional transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy to magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: a prospective cohort trial.比较传统经直肠超声前列腺活检与磁共振成像-超声融合引导活检的操作焦虑和疼痛:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2024 Jun;27(2):294-299. doi: 10.1038/s41391-023-00760-5. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
3
Pain in Men Undergoing Transperineal Free-Hand Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fusion Targeted Biopsies under Local Anesthesia: Outcomes and Predictors from a Multicenter Study of 1,008 Patients.在局部麻醉下经会阴自由手多参数磁共振成像融合靶向活检的男性患者的疼痛:来自 1008 例患者的多中心研究的结果和预测因素。
J Urol. 2020 Dec;204(6):1209-1215. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001234. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
4
Ultrasound Versus Computed Tomography-Guided Native Parenchymal Kidney Biopsies for Hospitalized Patients: Comparison of Clinical Outcomes and Complications.超声引导与 CT 引导下的住院患者肾活检:临床结局和并发症比较。
Ultrasound Q. 2022 Dec 1;38(4):328-333. doi: 10.1097/RUQ.0000000000000614. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
5
Ultrasound Guidance Versus CT Guidance for Peripheral Lung Biopsy: Performance According to Lesion Size and Pleural Contact.超声引导与 CT 引导下经皮外周肺活检:根据病变大小和胸膜接触的性能。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Mar;210(3):W110-W117. doi: 10.2214/AJR.17.18014. Epub 2018 Jan 24.
6
Percutaneous image-guided core biopsy of solid renal masses: analysis of safety, efficacy, pathologic interpretation, and clinical significance.经皮影像引导下的肾脏实体肿块穿刺活检:安全性、有效性、病理解读和临床意义分析。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2018 Jul;43(7):1813-1819. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1337-7.
7
Procedure-Related Pain During Image-Guided Percutaneous Biopsies: A Retrospective Study of Prevalence and Predictive Factors.影像引导经皮穿刺活检术中与操作相关的疼痛:一项回顾性研究其流行率及预测因素。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2019 Oct;213(4):755-761. doi: 10.2214/AJR.19.21248. Epub 2019 Jul 9.
8
Clinical utility of real-time ultrasound-multimodality fusion guidance for percutaneous biopsy of focal liver lesions.实时超声-多模态融合引导在经皮肝脏局灶性病变活检中的临床应用。
Eur J Radiol. 2018 Jun;103:76-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
9
Image-Guided Percutaneous Omental and Mesenteric Biopsy: Assessment of Technical Success Rate and Diagnostic Yield.影像引导下经皮大网膜和肠系膜活检:技术成功率及诊断率评估
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017 Nov;28(11):1569-1576. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
10
Ultrasound-guided percutaneous rib biopsy: a safe procedure with high diagnostic yield.超声引导经皮肋骨活检:一种安全且诊断率高的操作。
Clin Radiol. 2019 Aug;74(8):650.e1-650.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Efficacy of nitrous oxide in adults undergoing puncture biopsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.笑气用于成人穿刺活检的疗效:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 6;18(6):e0286713. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286713. eCollection 2023.