Li Muzhi, Tang Yifu, Chen Can, Zhou Jiefu, Zheng Cheng, Chen Huabin, Lu Hongbin, Qu Jin
Department of Sports Medicine & Research Centre of Sports Medicine, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Key Laboratory of Organ Injury, Aging and Regenerative Medicine of Hunan Province, Changsha, China.
J Orthop Translat. 2020 Jan 18;21:49-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.12.007. eCollection 2020 Mar.
Many orthopedic surgical procedures involve reattachment between tendon and bone. Whether bone-tendon healing is better facilitated by tendon fixation on a bone surface or within a tunnel is unknown. The purpose of this study was to comparatively evaluate the effects of bone surface versus bone trough fixation on bone-tendon healing in a rabbit patella-patellar tendon (PPT) injury model.
The rabbits underwent partial patellectomy with patellar-tendon fixation on the osteotomy surface (bone surface fixation, BSF group) (n = 28) or within a bone trough (bone trough fixation, BTF group) (n = 28). The PPT interface was evaluated by macroscopic observation, micro-computed tomography scanning, histological analysis, and biomechanical testing at postoperative week 8 or week 16.
Macroscopically, no signs of infection or osteoarthritis were observed, and the regenerated tissue bridging the residual patella and patellar tendon showed no obvious difference between the two groups. There were significantly higher bone mineral density and trabecular thickness in BSF group compared with BTF group at week 8 ( < 0.05 for both). However, the bone volume fraction (BVF), bone mineral density and trabecular thickness in BSF group were significantly lower than those in BTF group ( < 0.05 for all) at week 16. Histological analysis demonstrated that new bone was formed at the proximal patella and reattached to the residual patellar tendon through a regenerated fibrocartilage-like tissue in both groups. There was more formation and better remodelling of fibrocartilage-like tissue in BTF group than BSF group at week 8 and week 16 ( < 0.05 for both). Biomechanical testing revealed that there was higher failure load and stiffness at the PPT interface in BTF group than BSF group at week 16 ( < 0.05 for both).
These results suggested that raptured tendon fixation in a bone trough resulted in superior bone-tendon healing in comparison with tendon fixation on bone surface in a rabbit PPT injury model.
Although the structural and functional difference of knee joint between human and rabbit limit the results to be directly used in clinical, our research does offer a valuable reference for the improvement of reattachment between bone and tendon.
许多骨科手术都涉及肌腱与骨的重新附着。目前尚不清楚肌腱固定在骨表面还是骨隧道内是否更有利于骨 - 肌腱愈合。本研究的目的是在兔髌-髌腱(PPT)损伤模型中,比较评估骨表面固定与骨槽固定对骨-肌腱愈合的影响。
对兔子进行部分髌骨切除术,并将髌腱固定在截骨表面(骨表面固定,BSF组)(n = 28)或骨槽内(骨槽固定,BTF组)(n = 28)。在术后第8周或第16周,通过宏观观察、显微计算机断层扫描、组织学分析和生物力学测试对PPT界面进行评估。
宏观上,未观察到感染或骨关节炎迹象,两组中连接残余髌骨和髌腱的再生组织无明显差异。在第8周时,BSF组的骨矿物质密度和骨小梁厚度显著高于BTF组(两者均P < 0.05)。然而,在第16周时,BSF组的骨体积分数(BVF)、骨矿物质密度和骨小梁厚度均显著低于BTF组(所有均P < 0.05)。组织学分析表明,两组中髌骨近端均形成了新骨,并通过再生的纤维软骨样组织重新附着于残余髌腱。在第8周和第16周时,BTF组中纤维软骨样组织的形成和重塑均优于BSF组(两者均P < 0.05)。生物力学测试显示,在第16周时,BTF组PPT界面的破坏载荷和刚度均高于BSF组(两者均P < 0.05)。
这些结果表明,在兔PPT损伤模型中,与肌腱固定在骨表面相比,肌腱固定在骨槽内可实现更好的骨-肌腱愈合。
尽管人与兔膝关节的结构和功能差异限制了研究结果直接应用于临床,但我们的研究确实为改善骨与肌腱的重新附着提供了有价值的参考。