Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany, Sigmund-Freud-Straße 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2020 Jun;140(6):815-825. doi: 10.1007/s00402-020-03379-6. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
The treatment of severe acetabular bone loss remains a difficult challenge. No classification system is available that combines intuitive use, structured design and offers a therapeutic recommendation according to the current literature and modern state of the art treatment options. The goal of this study is to introduce an intuitive, reproducible and reliable guideline for the evaluation and treatment of acetabular defects.
The proposed Acetabular Defect Classification (ADC) is based on the integrity of the acetabular rim and supporting structures. It consists of 4 main types of defects ascending in severity and subdivisions narrowing down-defect location. Type 1 presents an intact acetabular rim, type 2 includes a noncontained defect of the acetabular rim ≤ 10 mm, in type 3 the rim defect exceeds 10 mm and type 4 includes different kinds of pelvic discontinuity. A collective of 207 preoperative radiographs were graded according to ADC and correlated with intraoperative findings. Additionally, a randomized sample of 80 patients was graded according to ADC by 5 observers to account for inter- and intra-rater reliability.
We evaluated the agreement of preoperative, radiographic grading and intraoperative findings presenting with a k value of 0.74. Interobserver agreement presented with a k value of 0.62 and intraobserver at a k value of 0.78.
The ADC offers an intuitive, reliable and reproducible classification system. It guides the surgeon pre- and intraoperatively through a complex field of practice.
严重髋臼骨缺损的治疗仍然是一个难题。目前尚无一种分类系统能够将直观使用、结构化设计和根据当前文献和现代治疗方法相结合,提供治疗建议。本研究的目的是引入一种直观、可重复和可靠的髋臼缺损评估和治疗指南。
提出的髋臼缺损分类(ADC)基于髋臼缘和支撑结构的完整性。它由 4 种主要类型的缺陷组成,严重程度递增,细分缺陷位置。1 型为完整的髋臼缘,2 型包括髋臼缘非包容性缺陷 ≤ 10mm,3 型为髋臼缘缺陷超过 10mm,4 型包括不同类型的骨盆连续性中断。对 207 例术前 X 线片根据 ADC 进行分级,并与术中发现相关联。此外,还对 80 例患者的随机样本进行了 ADC 分级,由 5 名观察者进行评估,以评估组内和组间的可靠性。
我们评估了术前、放射学分级和术中发现的一致性,K 值为 0.74。观察者间的一致性为 K 值 0.62,观察者内的一致性为 K 值 0.78。
ADC 提供了一种直观、可靠和可重复的分类系统。它在术前和术中为外科医生提供指导,使其能够在一个复杂的领域中进行操作。