Faculty of Management, University of Tehran, Jalal Al-e-Ahmad Ave., Nasr Bridge, Tehran 14155-6311, Iran.
Institute of Sustainable Construction, Laboratory of Operational Research, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Sauletekio av. 11, Vilnius LT-10223, Lithuania.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 24;17(4):1442. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17041442.
The construction industry is considered as one of the most dangerous industries in terms of occupational safety and has a high rate of occupational incidents and risks compared to other industries. Given the importance of identifying and assessing the occupational hazards in this industry, researchers have conducted numerous studies using statistical methods, multi-criteria decision-making methods, expert-based judgments, and so on. Although, these researchers have used linguistic variables, fuzzy sets and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets to overcome challenges such as uncertainty and ambiguity in the risk assessment conducted by experts; the previous models lack in efficiency if the experts are hesitant in their assessment. This leads to the inability to assign a specific membership degree to any risk. Therefore, in this research, it is tried to provide an improved approach to the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) method using an Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method based on the hesitant fuzzy set, which can effectively cope with the hesitance of the experts in the evaluation. Also, Stepwise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) method is applied for risk factor weighing in the proposed approach. This model is applied to a construction industry case study to solve a realistic occupational risk assessment. Moreover, a comparison is made between the results of this model and those obtained by the conventional FMEA and some other aggregation operators. The results indicate that the newly developed approach is useful and flexible to address complex FMEA problems and can generate logical and reliable priority rankings for failure modes.
建筑行业被认为是职业安全方面最危险的行业之一,与其他行业相比,其职业事故和风险率较高。鉴于识别和评估该行业职业危害的重要性,研究人员已经使用统计方法、多准则决策方法、基于专家的判断等方法进行了许多研究。尽管这些研究人员已经使用语言变量、模糊集和区间直觉模糊集来克服专家在风险评估中遇到的不确定性和模糊性等挑战;但如果专家在评估中犹豫不决,这些先前的模型缺乏效率。这导致无法为任何风险分配特定的隶属度。因此,在这项研究中,尝试使用基于犹豫模糊集的多准则决策 (MCDM) 方法对失效模式和影响分析 (FMEA) 方法进行改进,该方法可以有效地应对评估中专家的犹豫。此外,还在提出的方法中应用了逐步权重评估比分析 (SWARA) 方法来对风险因素进行加权。该模型应用于建筑行业案例研究,以解决现实职业风险评估问题。此外,还对该模型的结果与传统 FMEA 和其他一些聚合运算符的结果进行了比较。结果表明,新开发的方法对于解决复杂的 FMEA 问题非常有用且灵活,并且可以为失效模式生成逻辑和可靠的优先级排序。