Department of Internal Medicine, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine, Jeju, Korea.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
J Korean Med Sci. 2020 Mar 2;35(8):e48. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2020.35.e48.
Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is common in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and is associated with poor outcomes. This study was performed to determine the clinical efficacy of PH-specific therapeutic agents for IPF patients.
We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register. We searched randomized controlled trials (RCTs) without language restriction until November 2018. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality to end of study.
We analyzed 10 RCTs involving 2,124 patients, 1,274 of whom received PH-specific agents. In pooled estimates, the use of PH-specific agents was not significantly associated with reduced all-cause mortality to end of study compared with controls (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92, 1.06; = 0.71; ² = 30%). When we performed subgroup analyses according to the type of PH-specific agent, sample size, age, forced vital capacity, diffusion lung capacity, and the extent of honeycombing, PH-specific agents also showed no significant association with a reduction in all-cause mortality. A small but significant improvement in quality of life, measured using the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire total score, was found in the PH-specific agent group (mean difference, -3.16 points; 95% CI, -5.34, -0.97; = 0.005; ² = 0%). We found no significant changes from baseline in lung function, dyspnea, or exercise capacity. Serious adverse events were similar between the two groups.
Although PH-specific agents provided small health-related quality-of-life benefits, our meta-analysis provides insufficient evidence to support their use in IPF patients.
特发性肺纤维化(IPF)患者常合并肺动脉高压(PH),且与不良预后相关。本研究旨在评估 PH 靶向治疗药物对 IPF 患者的临床疗效。
我们对 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 中央对照试验注册库进行了系统检索,检索时间截至 2018 年 11 月,未对语言进行限制。我们纳入了所有随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结局为研究结束时的全因死亡率。
我们分析了 10 项 RCT,共纳入 2124 例患者,其中 1274 例接受了 PH 靶向药物治疗。汇总估计结果显示,与对照组相比,PH 靶向药物治疗并未显著降低研究结束时的全因死亡率(风险比,0.99;95%置信区间,0.92,1.06; = 0.71;² = 30%)。当我们根据 PH 靶向药物的类型、样本量、年龄、用力肺活量、弥散量和蜂窝肺的程度进行亚组分析时,PH 靶向药物治疗也与全因死亡率降低无关。PH 靶向药物治疗组的圣乔治呼吸问卷总评分(St. George Respiratory Questionnaire total score)健康相关生活质量评分略有改善(平均差值,-3.16 分;95%置信区间,-5.34,-0.97; = 0.005;² = 0%)。我们未发现肺功能、呼吸困难或运动能力从基线开始有显著变化。两组严重不良事件相似。
尽管 PH 靶向药物治疗可带来微小的健康相关生活质量获益,但本 meta 分析并未提供充分证据支持其在 IPF 患者中的应用。