Suppr超能文献

新辅助放疗可提高 T3/4N+M0 直肠肿瘤患者的总生存率:一项 20300 例患者的基于人群研究。

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy improves overall survival for T3/4N+M0 rectal cancer patients: a population-based study of 20300 patients.

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China.

Graduate School, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310003, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Radiat Oncol. 2020 Feb 27;15(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01497-4.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) has been shown to improve local control; however, whether it can improve overall survival (OS) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients remains controversial. We therefore aimed to examine the benefits of surgery alone, neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT), adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy in stage II (T3/4N0M0) and III (any T and N + M0) on the OS of rectal cancer patients.

METHODS

Date from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed between 2004 and 2016 were used. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to compare patient prognoses across different treatment modalities. Cox hazard regression analysis were used to identify independent predictors of OS.

RESULTS

For stage T3/4N0M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 115.89 months (M), 111.97 M, and 117.22 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival, 88.96 M). For stage T1/2N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy resulted in similar OS (all p > 0.05; mean survival, 121.50 M, 124.25 M, and 121.20 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 83.81 M). For stage T3/4N + M0 patients, neoadjuvant RT (HR = 0.436; 95% CI, 0.396~0.478; p < 0.001) resulted in significantly longer OS than adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy (mean survival, 104.47 M, 93.94 M, and 93.62 M, respectively), with better OS observed in these patients than in patients who underwent surgery alone (all p < 0.001, mean survival 54.87 M). Older age (> 60 years), black race, unmarried status, high tumour grade, and tumour size > 5 cm were all associated with a poor prognosis (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant RT, adjuvant RT, and surgery plus chemotherapy results in better OS than surgery alone in LARC patients. Neoadjuvant RT has the potential to be highly recommended over adjuvant RT and surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N + M0 patients; however, it showed no OS advantage over adjuvant RT or surgery plus chemotherapy for T3/4N0M0 and T1/2N + M0 patients.

摘要

背景

新辅助放疗(RT)已被证明可改善局部控制;然而,它是否能改善局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)患者的总生存(OS)仍存在争议。因此,我们旨在检查单纯手术、新辅助放疗(RT)、辅助 RT 和手术加化疗在 II 期(T3/4N0M0)和 III 期(任何 T 和 N+M0)对直肠癌患者 OS 的益处。

方法

使用来自监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库的数据,诊断时间为 2004 年至 2016 年。Kaplan-Meier 分析用于比较不同治疗方式的患者预后。Cox 风险回归分析用于识别 OS 的独立预测因素。

结果

对于 T3/4N0M0 期患者,新辅助 RT、辅助 RT 和手术加化疗的 OS 相似(均 p>0.05;中位生存时间分别为 115.89 个月(M)、111.97 M 和 117.22 M),与单纯手术相比,这些患者的 OS 更好(均 p<0.001,中位生存时间为 88.96 M)。对于 T1/2N+M0 期患者,新辅助 RT、辅助 RT 和手术加化疗的 OS 相似(均 p>0.05;中位生存时间分别为 121.50 M、124.25 M 和 121.20 M),与单纯手术相比,这些患者的 OS 更好(均 p<0.001,中位生存时间为 83.81 M)。对于 T3/4N+M0 期患者,新辅助 RT(HR=0.436;95%CI,0.396~0.478;p<0.001)与辅助 RT 和手术加化疗相比,OS 显著延长(中位生存时间分别为 104.47 M、93.94 M 和 93.62 M),与单纯手术相比,这些患者的 OS 更好(均 p<0.001,中位生存时间为 54.87 M)。年龄较大(>60 岁)、黑种人、未婚、高肿瘤分级和肿瘤大小>5 cm 均与预后不良相关(均 p<0.05)。

结论

新辅助 RT、辅助 RT 和手术加化疗比单纯手术在 LARC 患者中具有更好的 OS。新辅助 RT 有可能比辅助 RT 和手术加化疗更适用于 T3/4N+M0 患者;然而,它在 T3/4N0M0 和 T1/2N+M0 患者中与辅助 RT 或手术加化疗相比,并没有显示出 OS 优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0c2f/7045410/484536820c38/13014_2020_1497_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验