Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy.
J Abnorm Psychol. 2020 May;129(4):408-421. doi: 10.1037/abn0000505. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
Individuals with psychosis report employing more maladaptive and less adaptive emotion regulation (ER) strategies compared to nonclinical controls (NCs). However, it is unknown whether this is predictive of affect experienced in daily life and whether ER strategies are used less frequently and effectively by individuals with psychosis in daily life. Individuals with psychosis and current delusions (PDs; = 71) and NCs ( = 42) completed questionnaires of habitual ER and experience sampling over 6 consecutive days, in which they reported 10 times a day on the presence of negative and positive affect and deployment of ER strategies (reappraisal, acceptance, awareness, suppression, rumination, distraction, and social sharing). Effectiveness of strategy use was operationalized by examining successive differences in positive and negative affect. Multilevel regression analyses were conducted. Questionnaires of habitual ER were largely predictive of affect in daily life. There was indication of a more frequent use of putatively maladaptive strategies but either no differences in individual adaptive strategies or even a more frequent use (reappraisal) in PDs compared to NCs. Several ER strategies (e.g., reappraisal, rumination) proved effective in reducing negative affect by the next prompt, independent of group, but suppression was effective in only PDs and acceptance had unfavorable effects in both groups. Thus, PDs demonstrated an increased use of ER strategies in daily life, of which the majority helped them to reduce negative affect. This indicates that their increased levels of negative affect are not explicable by difficulties in deploying explicit ER strategies. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
与非临床对照(NC)相比,精神病患者报告采用更多的适应不良和较少的适应性情绪调节(ER)策略。但是,尚不清楚这是否可以预测日常生活中的情感体验,以及精神病患者在日常生活中是否较少使用和有效使用 ER 策略。有精神病和当前妄想(PD;n = 71)和 NC(n = 42)的个体在连续 6 天内完成了习惯性 ER 和经验抽样的问卷,他们每天报告 10 次负面和正面情绪的出现和 ER 策略的运用(重新评估、接受、意识、抑制、反刍、分心和社会分享)。策略使用的有效性是通过检查积极和消极影响的连续差异来确定的。进行了多层次回归分析。习惯性 ER 的问卷在很大程度上可以预测日常生活中的情感。有迹象表明,更多地使用假定的适应不良策略,但个体适应性策略没有差异,甚至在 PD 中比在 NC 中更频繁地使用(重新评估)。几种 ER 策略(例如,重新评估、反刍)被证明可以有效地减少下一个提示的负面情绪,而与组无关,但抑制仅在 PD 中有效,而接受在两个组中都有不利影响。因此,PD 在日常生活中表现出更多地使用 ER 策略,其中大多数有助于减轻负面情绪。这表明,他们更高水平的负面情绪不能用难以部署明确的 ER 策略来解释。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2020 APA,保留所有权利)。