• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由代理人决定的延迟折扣率取决于接受者的吸烟状况。

Delay discounting rate by a surrogate decision maker depends on the smoking status of the recipient.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Feb;29(1):73-81. doi: 10.1037/pha0000356. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1037/pha0000356
PMID:32105134
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7483137/
Abstract

The tendency to devalue future rewards is known as delay discounting. Discounting is measured using a series of intertemporal choices between smaller, sooner outcomes and larger, later outcomes. We used a surrogate delay discounting task to explore whether such choices would differ if a hypothetical recipient was a smoker or was an individual with good health habits. Across three studies, the descriptions of the recipient included only information about smoking status ( = 66), smoking status and equal annual income ( = 47), and smoking status and equal weekly expenditures ( = 42). Higher rates of delay discounting for the smoker recipient compared to the nonsmoker recipient were observed across all three studies. These results parallel previous findings showing group differences in discounting between actual smokers and nonsmokers. We discuss the similarities between the present results and previous studies in light of an extension of Bem's (1967) self-perception theory, which posits that choices in laboratory-based delay discounting tasks are informed by observation of real-world intertemporal choice. The theory asserts that there is no fundamental difference between a first-person account of such knowledge and a third-person account. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

摘要

未来奖励贬值的趋势被称为延迟折扣。折扣是通过一系列较小、较早的结果和较大、较晚的结果之间的跨时间选择来衡量的。我们使用替代延迟折扣任务来探索如果假设的接受者是吸烟者或具有良好健康习惯的个体,这种选择是否会有所不同。在三项研究中,接受者的描述仅包括吸烟状况的信息(= 66)、吸烟状况和相等的年收入(= 47)以及吸烟状况和相等的每周支出(= 42)。与非吸烟者接受者相比,吸烟者接受者的延迟折扣率在所有三项研究中均较高。这些结果与之前的研究结果相平行,这些研究结果显示了实际吸烟者和非吸烟者之间在折扣方面的群体差异。鉴于 Bem(1967)的自我知觉理论的扩展,我们根据该理论讨论了当前结果与先前研究之间的相似性,该理论假设实验室延迟折扣任务中的选择是由对现实世界跨时间选择的观察所告知的。该理论断言,这种知识的第一人称叙述和第三人称叙述之间没有根本区别。(PsycInfo 数据库记录(c)2021 APA,保留所有权利)。

相似文献

1
Delay discounting rate by a surrogate decision maker depends on the smoking status of the recipient.由代理人决定的延迟折扣率取决于接受者的吸烟状况。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Feb;29(1):73-81. doi: 10.1037/pha0000356. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
Past and future preference reversals are predicted by delay discounting in smokers and non-smokers.吸烟者和非吸烟者的延迟折扣预测了过去和未来的偏好逆转。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Feb;27(1):19-28. doi: 10.1037/pha0000224. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
3
To smoke or not to smoke: Does delay discounting affect the proximal choice to smoke?吸烟还是不吸:延迟折扣是否会影响吸烟的近端选择?
Subst Use Misuse. 2019;54(8):1237-1246. doi: 10.1080/10826084.2018.1528463. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
4
Does delay discounting predict maladaptive health and financial behaviors in smokers?延迟折扣是否能预测吸烟者的不良健康和财务行为?
Health Psychol. 2019 Jan;38(1):21-28. doi: 10.1037/hea0000695. Epub 2018 Nov 26.
5
Setting a goal could help you control: Comparing the effect of health goal versus general episodic future thinking on health behaviors among cigarette smokers and obese individuals.设定目标可能有助于你控制:比较健康目标与一般情景式未来思维对吸烟者和肥胖者健康行为的影响。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2021 Feb;29(1):59-72. doi: 10.1037/pha0000351. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
6
Waiting in intertemporal choice tasks affects discounting and subjective time perception.在跨期选择任务中等待会影响折扣和主观时间感知。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2020 Dec;149(12):2289-2313. doi: 10.1037/xge0000771. Epub 2020 May 11.
7
Temporal discounting when outcomes are experienced in the moment: Validation of a novel paradigm and comparison with a classic hypothetical intertemporal choice task.当结果在当下体验时的时间折扣:一种新颖范式的验证及其与经典假设跨期选择任务的比较。
PLoS One. 2021 May 14;16(5):e0251480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251480. eCollection 2021.
8
Delay discounting and e-cigarette use: An investigation in current, former, and never cigarette smokers.延迟折扣与电子烟使用:在当前吸烟者、曾经吸烟者和从不吸烟者中的调查。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2018 Oct 1;191:165-173. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2018.06.034. Epub 2018 Aug 11.
9
Differences in delay discounting between smokers and nonsmokers remain when both rewards are delayed.当两种奖励都被延迟时,吸烟者和非吸烟者之间的延迟折扣差异仍然存在。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2012 Jan;219(2):549-62. doi: 10.1007/s00213-011-2521-z. Epub 2011 Oct 8.
10
Episodic future thinking reduces delay discounting and cigarette demand: an investigation of the good-subject effect.间歇性未来思考减少延迟折扣和香烟需求:良好受试者效应的调查。
J Behav Med. 2018 Apr;41(2):269-276. doi: 10.1007/s10865-017-9908-1. Epub 2017 Dec 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Voucher-Based Contingency Management is Efficacious but Underutilized in Treating Addictions.基于代金券的应急管理在治疗成瘾方面有效,但未得到充分利用。
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jul 29;42(3):501-524. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00216-z. eCollection 2019 Sep.
2
Technology-Based Contingency Management in the Treatment of Substance-Use Disorders.基于技术的应急管理在物质使用障碍治疗中的应用
Perspect Behav Sci. 2019 Jul 9;42(3):445-464. doi: 10.1007/s40614-019-00214-1. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Delay Discounting as a Transdiagnostic Process in Psychiatric Disorders: A Meta-analysis.
延迟折扣作为精神障碍共病过程的研究:一项荟萃分析。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 Nov 1;76(11):1176-1186. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2019.2102.
4
Behavioral trainings and manipulations to reduce delay discounting: A systematic review.行为训练和操作以减少延迟折扣:系统评价。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Dec;26(6):1803-1849. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01629-2.
5
Repeated administration of synthetic cathinone 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone persistently increases impulsive choice in rats.反复给予合成卡西酮3,4-亚甲基二氧吡咯戊酮会持续增加大鼠的冲动选择。
Behav Pharmacol. 2019 Oct;30(7):555-565. doi: 10.1097/FBP.0000000000000492.
6
Do our risk preferences change when we make decisions for others? A meta-analysis of self-other differences in decisions involving risk.当我们为他人做决策时,我们的风险偏好会改变吗?涉及风险的自我-他人决策差异的元分析。
PLoS One. 2019 May 8;14(5):e0216566. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0216566. eCollection 2019.
7
Excessive discounting of delayed reinforcers as a trans-disease process: Update on the state of the science.过度低估延迟强化物的价值:科学研究现状更新。
Curr Opin Psychol. 2019 Dec;30:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.01.005. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
8
Early life adversity and increased delay discounting: Findings from the Family Health Patterns project.早期生活逆境与延迟折扣增加:家庭健康模式项目的研究结果。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019 Apr;27(2):153-159. doi: 10.1037/pha0000241. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
9
Experimental reductions of delay discounting and impulsive choice: A systematic review and meta-analysis.实验性降低延迟折扣和冲动选择:系统综述和荟萃分析。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2018 Sep;147(9):1349-1381. doi: 10.1037/xge0000462.
10
A meta-analysis of nonsystematic responding in delay and probability reward discounting.延迟和概率奖励折扣中非系统反应的荟萃分析。
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2018 Feb;26(1):94-107. doi: 10.1037/pha0000167.